Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38537034›Full record

ArticleRevista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo2024

Translation and measurement properties of the Portuguese-Brazil version of the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE-Br).

Michelle Alexandrina Dos Santos Furtado, Hércules Ribeiro Leite, Matheus Rocha Pereira Klettenberg, Victor Alves Rodrigues, Lisiane Seguti Ferreira, Melina Rodero Marques, Isadora de Oliveira Cavalcante, Tamires Saboia Santos, Tathiana Ghisi de Souza, Ayrles Silva Gonçalves Barbosa Mendonça and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle Alexandrina Dos Santos FurtadoUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2847-7471
Hércules Ribeiro LeiteUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8977-8131
Matheus Rocha Pereira KlettenbergUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5444-7404
Victor Alves RodriguesUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8606-6809
Lisiane Seguti FerreiraUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7037-1585
Melina Rodero MarquesUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2099-1556
Isadora de Oliveira CavalcanteUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9714-5948
Tamires Saboia SantosUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5827-9548
Tathiana Ghisi de SouzaFaculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí (FMJ), Jundiaí, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9957-1222
Ayrles Silva Gonçalves Barbosa MendonçaUniversidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3676-7292
Ana Cristina Resende CamargosUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2719-4231
Kênnea Martins Almeida AyupeUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4410-8748
Universidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRFaculdade de Medicina de Jundiaí · BRUniversidade Federal do Amazonas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe current study aimed to translate the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) into Brazilian Portuguese and analyze the reliability of the translated version for a population of Brazilian infants.

methodsThis was a methodological study, approved by the Ethics Committee, carried out between June 2020 and May 2021. HINE is a standardized clinical neurological examination used for the early detection of cerebral palsy. The quantitative section, "neurological examination", contains 26 items scored from 0 to 3 points, divided into five categories: cranial nerve function, posture, movements, muscle tone and reflexes, and reactions. The HINE translation followed four steps: translation, synthesis, back-translation, and evaluation by an expert committee. To verify the reliability of the HINE-Br (Portuguese-Brazil version) two independent examiners evaluated 43 infants, between 3 and 22 months of age. Internal consistency was verified by Cronbach's Alpha coefficient and interrater reliability by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

resultsThe translated version was similar to the original version and a few semantic and idiomatic adjustments were necessary. Appropriate internal consistency (Alpha=0.91) was found for the 26 items of the HINE-Br, as well as strong interrater reliability for the total score (ICC2.1=0.95), and also for the five categories (ICC2.1=0.83-0.95).

conclusionsThe HINE-Br presents adequate rates of internal consistency and interrater reliability, and can be used for the evaluation of children at risk for cerebral palsy, between 3 and 24 months of age, by pediatricians and pediatric physical therapists.

Indexed as

Cerebral PalsyBrazilChildHumansInfantNeurologic ExaminationPortugalReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslations

Identifiers

PMID38537034
PMCPMC10962631
OpenAlexW4393170202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.