Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38536877›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Comparative study on differential expression analysis methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data with small biological replicates: Based on single-cell transcriptional data of PBMCs from COVID-19 severe patients.

Jie Xue, Xinfan Zhou, Jing Yang, Adan Niu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jie XueDepartment of Statistics, School of Economics, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3946-1053
Xinfan ZhouDepartment of Statistics, School of Economics, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China.
Jing YangDepartment of Statistics, School of Economics, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China.
Adan NiuDepartment of Statistics, School of Economics, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a high-throughput experimental technique for studying gene expression at the single-cell level. As a key component of single-cell data analysis, differential expression analysis (DEA) serves as the foundation for all subsequent secondary studies. Despite the fact that biological replicates are of vital importance in DEA process, small biological replication is still common in sequencing experiment now, which may impose problems to current DEA methods. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a thorough comparison of various DEA approaches under small biological replications. Here, we compare 6 performance metrics on both simulated and real scRNA-seq datasets to assess the adaptability of 8 DEA approaches, with a particular emphasis on how well they function under small biological replications. Our findings suggest that DEA algorithms extended from bulk RNA-seq are still competitive under small biological replicate conditions, whereas the newly developed method DEF-scRNA-seq which is based on information entropy offers significant advantages. Our research not only provides appropriate suggestions for selecting DEA methods under different conditions, but also emphasizes the application value of machine learning algorithms in this field.

Indexed as

COVID-19SoftwareAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingHumansSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

PMID38536877
PMCPMC10971542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.