ArticlePLOS global public health2024
Factors associated with the uptake of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria during pregnancy in Cameroon: An analysis of data from the 2018 Cameroon Demographic and Health Survey.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing malaria-in-pregnancy monitoring: stakeholder experiences and data integration into the BornFyne-PNMS digital platform in Cameroon.BMJ global health · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, practices, and future intentions to use intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine among pregnant women in southern Ghana.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Wealth-based inequalities in the uptake of three or more doses of intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy in West Africa, 2015-2021.Malaria journal · 2025Article
- Association between adequacy of antenatal care and uptake of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy among women in Ghana.Malaria journal · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malaria in pregnancy is a major public health concern that contributes to a significant increase in maternal and child mortality and morbidity. Intermittent preventive treatment of malaria during pregnancy using sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) is a key intervention recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) and implemented in Cameroon to reduce the morbidity associated with malaria during pregnancy. This study aimed to assess the distribution of the poor uptake of IPTp-SP (i.e. fewer than three doses) in Cameroon and the factors associated. We conducted a secondary analysis of data extracted from the 2018 Cameroon Demographic and Health Survey. Data was collected using a face-to-face questionnaire administered to mothers with at least one child under the age of five. The participants were selected using a two-stage stratified sampling process. We estimated the frequencies of mothers receiving fewer than three doses of IPTp-SP. Multilevel logistic regression modeling was used to assess the associations between key suspected determinants and uptake of fewer than three doses of IPTp-SP. Crude and adjusted Odds-Ratio (ORs) were estimated. A total of 13,527 women of childbearing age were interviewed, of whom 5,528 (40.9%) met our selection criteria. Among them, 845 (15.3%) women had no antenatal consultation (ANC) visit, 1,109 (20%) had 1-3 visits, 3,379 (61.1%) had 4-7 visits, and only 195 (3.5%) had at least eight visits. Moreover, 3,398 (61.5%, CI: 60.2-62.8) had received fewer than three doses of IPTp-SP. Our findings show that the predictors of poor uptake of IPTp-SP include attending the first ANC visit after the third month of pregnancy (aOR = 1.52, CI: 1.30-1.77), attending fewer than four ANC visits (aOR = 1.29, CI: 1.06-1.56), and not being attended to by a healthcare professional during the prenatal period (aOR = 4.63, CI: 2.81-7.64). Residing in the Sahelian regions was not increasing the risk of poor IPTp-SP uptake on its own but was positively modifying the effect of not being attended by a healthcare professional (p < 0.001). We did not find a significant association between a higher level of education and the uptake of IPTp-SP (aOR = 1.10, CI: 0.90-1.32). Nearly two third of the pregnant women in Cameroon have a poor uptake of IPTp-SP. Interventions focused on ANC provision ought to be explored and tested to address this gap, with priority assigned to the Sahelian region.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.