Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38536852›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2024

Barriers and facilitators to parents' engagement with and perceived impact of a childhood obesity app: A mixed-methods study.

Madison Milne-Ives, Em Rahman, Hannah Bradwell, Rebecca Baines, Timothy Boey, Alison Potter, Wendy Lawrence, Michelle Helena van Velthoven, Edward Meinert

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05261555 (Acceptability and Usability of a Mobile Health App for Family Obesity Prevention and Management), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05261555 nacompletednot on this map

Acceptability and Usability of a Mobile Health App for Family Obesity Prevention and Management: A Mixed-methods Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PlymouthRan2020 to 2021Enrolled231ConditionsChild ObesityArmsNoObesity app
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mapping the Process of Engagement With Digital Health Interventions: A Cross-Case Synthesis.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Madison Milne-IvesTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7628-882X
Em RahmanSouth East School of Public Health, Workforce Training and Education Directorate, NHS England, United Kingdom.
Hannah BradwellSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Rebecca BainesPeninsula Medical School, Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Timothy BoeySchool of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Alison PotterSouth East School of Public Health, Workforce Training and Education Directorate, NHS England, United Kingdom.
Wendy LawrencePrimary Care, Population Science and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Michelle Helena van VelthovenNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Edward MeinertTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2484-3347

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Childhood obesity is a growing global health concern. Although mobile health apps have the potential to deliver behavioural interventions, their impact is commonly limited by a lack of sufficient engagement. The purpose of this study was to explore barriers and facilitators to engagement with a family-focused app and its perceived impact on motivation, self-efficacy, and behaviour. Parents with at least one child under 18 and healthcare professionals working with children were recruited; all participants were allocated to use the NoObesity app over a 6-month period. The mixed-methods design was based on the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability and Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance frameworks. Qualitative and quantitative data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, questionnaires, and app use data (logins and in-app self-reported data). 35 parents were included in the final analysis; quantitative results were analysed descriptively and thematic analysis was conducted on the qualitative data. Key barriers to engagement were boredom, forgetting, and usability issues and key barriers to potential impact on behaviours were accessibility, lack of motivation, and family characteristics. Novelty, gamification features, reminders, goal setting, progress monitoring and feedback, and suggestions for healthy foods and activities were key facilitators to engagement with the app and behaviours. A key observation was that intervention strategies could help address many motivation and capability barriers, but there was a gap in strategies addressing opportunity barriers. Without incorporating strategies that successfully mitigate barriers in all three determinants of behaviour, an intervention is unlikely to be successful. We highlight key recommendations for developers to consider when designing the features and implementation of digital health interventions. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05261555).

Identifiers

PMID38536852
PMCPMC10971669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.