Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38536842›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

GraphMHC: Neoantigen prediction model applying the graph neural network to molecular structure.

Hoyeon Jeong, Young-Rae Cho, Jungsoo Gim, Seung-Kuy Cha, Maengsup Kim, Dae Ryong Kang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Technical review of artificial intelligence in TCR-T therapy.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2026
    Review
  3. Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models for Cancer Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. IntelligentFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Computational Methods for Cancer Neoantigen Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hoyeon JeongDepartment of Biostatistics, Yonsei University, Wonju, Gangwon State, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6812-9343
Young-Rae ChoDivision of Software, Yonsei University Mirae Campus, Wonju, Gangwon State, Republic of Korea.
Jungsoo GimDepartment of Biomedical Science, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Seung-Kuy ChaDepartment of Physiology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Gangwon State, Republic of Korea.
Maengsup KimResearch Center, Mustbio, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Dae Ryong KangDepartment of Biostatistics, Yonsei University, Wonju, Gangwon State, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8792-9730
Yonsei University · KRChosun University · KRKoreaBio · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoantigens are tumor-derived peptides and are biomarkers that can predict prognosis related to immune checkpoint inhibition by estimating their binding to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) proteins. Although deep neural networks have been primarily used for these prediction models, it is difficult to interpret the models reported thus far as accurately representing the interactions between biomolecules. In this study, we propose the GraphMHC model, which utilizes a graph neural network model applied to molecular structure to simulate the binding between MHC proteins and peptide sequences. Amino acid sequences sourced from the immune epitope database (IEDB) undergo conversion into molecular structures. Subsequently, atomic intrinsic informations and inter-atomic connections are extracted and structured as a graph representation. Stacked graph attention and convolution layers comprise the GraphMHC network which classifies bindings. The prediction results from the test set using the GraphMHC model showed a high performance with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 92.2% (91.9-92.5%), surpassing a baseline model. Moreover, by applying the GraphMHC model to melanoma patient data from The Cancer Genome Atlas project, we found a borderline difference (0.061) in overall survival and a significant difference in stromal score between the high and low neoantigen load groups. This distinction was not present in the baseline model. This study presents the first feature-intrinsic method based on biochemical molecular structure for modeling the binding between MHC protein sequences and neoantigen candidate peptide sequences. This model can provide highly accurate responsibility information that can predict the prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitors to cancer patients who want to apply it.

Indexed as

MelanomaNeural Networks, ComputerAntigens, NeoplasmHumansMolecular StructurePeptidesAntigens, NeoplasmPeptides

Identifiers

PMID38536842
PMCPMC10971776
OpenAlexW4393235019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.