ArticlemAbs
Evaluation of the impact of antibody fragments on aggregation of intact molecules via size exclusion chromatography coupled with native mass spectrometry.
Article in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A FABulous approach to image human macrophages.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Stress-Induced Antibody Aggregates: Insights from Native SEC-MS with Postcolumn Denaturation.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2026Article
- Interdomain disulfide bonds of rabbit kappa light chain allotypes influence mouse-rabbit chimeric antibody performance.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Progress in mass spectrometry approaches to profiling protein-protein interactions in the studies of the innate immune system.Journal of proteins and proteomics · 2024Article
- Addressing challenging impurities in fusion proteins: A comprehensive review and cost-effective strategy for HCP and low molecular weight species control.Biotechnology progressReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aggregates are recognized as one of the most critical product-related impurities in monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based therapeutics due to their negative impact on the stability and safety of the drugs. So far, investigational efforts have primarily focused on understanding the causes and effects of mAb self-aggregation, including both internal and external factors. In this study, we focused on understanding mAb stability in the presence of its monovalent fragment, formed through hinge cleavage and loss of one Fab unit (referred to as "Fab/c"), a commonly observed impurity during manufacturing and stability. The Fab/c fragments were generated using a limited IgdE digestion that specifically cleaves above the IgG1 mAb hinge region, followed by hydrophobic interaction chromatographic (HIC) enrichment. Two IgG1 mAbs containing different levels of Fab/c fragments were incubated under thermally accelerated conditions. A method based on size exclusion chromatography coupled with native mass spectrometry (SEC-UV-native MS) was developed and used to characterize the stability samples and identified the formation of heterogeneous dimers, including intact dimer, mAb-Fab/c dimer, Fab/c-Fab/c dimer, and mAb-Fab dimer. Quantitative analyses on the aggregation kinetics suggested that the impact of Fab/c fragment on the aggregation rate of individual dimer differs between a glycosylated mAb (mAb1) and a non-glycosylated mAb (mAb2). An additional study of deglycosylated mAb1 under 25°C accelerated stability conditions suggests no significant impact of the N-glycan on mAb1 total aggregation rate. This study also highlighted the power of SEC-UV-native MS method in the characterization of mAb samples with regard to separating, identifying, and quantifying mAb aggregates and fragments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.