Trial reportHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2024
Three-year follow-up analysis of the short-stitch versus long-stitch technique for elective midline abdominal closure randomized-controlled (ESTOIH) trial.
Trial report in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01965249 (Short Stitch Versus Long Stitch Suture Technique Using Monomax® for Abdominal Wall Closure After Primary Median Laparotomy. A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blinded, Multicenter, International Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Short Stitch Versus Long Stitch Suture Technique Using Monomax® for Abdominal Wall Closure After Primary Median Laparotomy. A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blinded, Multicenter, International Trial
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of the SUture BIte TEchnique on clinical outcomes after midline laparotomy closure: SUBITE-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Reinforced tension-line suture after laparotomy: long-term results of Rein4CeTo1 randomized clinical trial.BJS open · 2025Trial
- 5-year clinical outcome of the ESTOIH trial comparing the short-bite versus large-bite technique for elective midline abdominal closure.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Trial
- Genetic Susceptibility to Incisional Hernia Evaluation of Hernia Polygenic Risk Scores.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Continuous fascial closure using absorbable barbed sutures lowers the risk of incisional hernia after minimally invasive colorectal surgery: a consecutive single-surgeon retrospective cohort study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Mesh suture repair of rectus diastasis with and without a concurrent ventral hernia.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
- Variable use of modern abdominal wall closure techniques at emergency laparotomy - an international, cross-sectional survey of surgical practice.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Article
- Safety and efficacy of prophylactic onlay resorbable synthetic mesh with a comprehensive wound bundle at laparotomy closure in high-risk emergency abdominal surgery: an observational study.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025Observational
- Suture Techniques and Materials for Fascial Closure of Abdominal Wall Incisions: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical trials have shown reduced incisional hernia rates 1 year after elective median laparotomy closure using a short-stitch technique. With hernia development continuing beyond the first postoperative year, we aimed to compare incisional hernias 3 years after midline closure using short or long stitches in patients from the ESTOIH trial.
methodsThe ESTOIH trial was a prospective, multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized-controlled study of primary elective midline closure. Patients were randomized to fascia closure using a short- or long-stitch technique with a poly-4-hydroxybutyrate-based suture. A predefined 3-year follow-up analysis was performed with the radiological imaging-verified incisional hernia rate as the primary endpoint.
resultsThe 3-year intention-to-treat follow-up cohort consisted of 414 patients (210 short-stitch and 204 long-stitch technique) for analysis. Compared with 1 year postoperatively, incisional hernias increased from 4.83% (20/414 patients) to 9.02% (36/399 patients, p = 0.0183). The difference between the treatment groups at 3 years (short vs. long stitches, 15/198 patients (7.58%) vs. 21/201 (10.45%)) was not significant (OR, 1.4233; 95% CI [0.7112-2.8485]; p = 0.31).
conclusionHernia rates increased significantly between one and 3 years postoperatively. The short-stitch technique using a poly-4-hydroxybutyrate-based suture is safe in the long term, while no significant advantage was found at 3 years postoperatively compared with the standard long-stitch technique. TRIAL REGISTRY: NCT01965249, registered on 18 October 2013.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.