ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2024
BDM: An Assessment Metric for Protein Complex Structure Models Based on Distance Difference Matrix.
Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein complex structure prediction is an important problem in computational biology. While significant progress has been made for protein monomers, accurate evaluation of protein complexes remains challenging. Existing assessment methods in CASP, lack dedicated metrics for evaluating complexes. DockQ, a widely used metric, has some limitations. In this study, we propose a novel metric called BDM (Based on Distance difference Matrix) for assessing protein complex prediction structures. Our approach utilizes a distance difference matrix derived from comparing real and predicted protein structures, establishing a linear correlation with Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD). BDM overcomes limitations associated with receptor-ligand differentiation and eliminates the requirement for structure alignment, making it a more effective and efficient metric. Evaluation of BDM using CASP14 and CASP15 test sets demonstrates superior performance compared to the official CASP scoring. BDM provides accurate and reasonable assessments of predicted protein complexes, wide adoption of BDM has the potential to advance protein complex structure prediction and facilitate related researches across scientific domains. Code is available at http://mialab.ruc.edu.cn/BDMServer/ .
Indexed as
Identifiers
38536590What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.