Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38536585›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2024

The Key Role of Tumor Budding in Predicting the Status of Lymph Node Involvement in Early Gastric Cancer Patients: A Clinical Multicenter Validation in China.

Xiangyu Wang, Xiuding Yang, Fenglin Cai, Mingzhi Cai, Yong Liu, Li Zhang, Rupeng Zhang, Fangqin Xue, Yan Sun, Jingyu Deng

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiangyu Wang *Department of Gastric Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Xiuding Yang *Department of Gastric Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Fenglin Cai *Department of Gastric Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Mingzhi CaiDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Yong LiuDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Li ZhangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Rupeng ZhangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Fangqin XueDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China. xuefangqingsl@sina.com.
Yan SunDepartment of Pathology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, People's Republic of China. sunyan@tjmuch.com.
Jingyu DengDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, People's Republic of China. dengery@126.com.
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CNFujian Provincial Hospital · CN

Funding

Distinguished professor of Tianjin JTZB [2019] No.120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate preoperative prediction of lymph node (LN) involvement is essential for the management of early gastric cancer (EGC). Our objective was to formulate a potent nomogram for predicting LN involvement in EGC by leveraging an innovative predictor of tumor budding.

methodsWe assembled a cohort of EGC patients who underwent radical surgery at two tertiary cancer centers. Tumor budding was stratified by using an optimal cutoff value and integrated with other clinicopathological variables to ascertain the risk factors associated with LN involvement. A nomogram was developed and its predictive performance was assessed by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration plots. In addition, we conducted decision curve analysis to evaluate its clinical utility. Finally, an external validation was conducted by using an independent cohort.

resultsFinally, 307 eligible patients (215 in the primary cohort and 92 in the validation cohort) were included. Tumor budding, categorized by a count of two, exhibited a robust association with LN involvement (OR 14.12, p = 0.012). Other significant risk factors include lymphovascular invasion, depth of tumor invasion, ulceration, and tumor differentiation. Notably, the nomogram demonstrated exceptional discriminative power (area under the ROC curve, 0.872 in the primary cohort and 0.885 in the validation cohort) and precise predictive capabilities. Furthermore, the nomogram showed notable clinical applicability through decision curve analysis, particularly in endoscopic curability C-2, by mitigating the risk of overtreatment.

conclusionsTumor budding is a robust predictor of LN involvement in EGC. The incorporation of tumor budding into a nomogram is an effective strategy, thereby informing and enhancing clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Lymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesNomogramsStomach NeoplasmsAgedChinaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrectomyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesEarly gastric cancerEndoscopic submucosal dissectionLymph node involvementNomogramTumor budding

Identifiers

PMID38536585
OpenAlexW4393233490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.