SynthesisEuropean radiology2024
Fine-needle aspiration cytology for neck lesions in patients with antithrombotic/anticoagulant medications: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the true risk of bleeding and nondiagnostic (ND) specimens associated with fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) for neck lesions in patients taking antithrombotic/anticoagulation (AT/AC) medications.
methodsUsing the Population Intervention Comparison and Outcome modeling, we searched PubMed and Google Scholar databases to identify studies published between January 2000 and March 2023 reporting the safety and sample adequacy of FNAC for neck lesions in patients taking AT/AC medications. The pooled incidences of bleeding and ND specimens and pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) obtained using a fixed-effects model were compared for patients continuing AT/AC (AT/AC group) and patients not receiving AT/AC therapy (no-AT/AC group).
resultsWe included six original articles involving a total of 3014 patients. The pooled incidence of bleeding was 0.9% (95% CI, 0.344-2.026) and 0.7% (95% CI, 0.390-1.146) in the AT/AC and no-AT/AC groups, respectively. The pooled RR under the fixed-effects model was 1.39 (95% CI, 0.56-3.44) with no evidence of between-study heterogeneity (I
conclusionsThe AT/AC medication is not associated with increased risk of bleeding or ND specimens in FNAC for neck lesions. Therefore, interruption of the AT/AC medication is not recommended before FNAC even in patients taking AT/AC medications. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study is the first meta-analysis evaluating risk of bleeding and nondiagnostic specimens associated with fine-needle cytology for neck lesions in patients taking antithrombotic/anticoagulation (AT/AC) medications. This suggests withholding AT/AC medications is not mandatory for safe and diagnostic FNACs. KEY POINTS: • True risk of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) for neck lesions in patients taking antithrombotic/anticoagulation (AT/AC) medications is still controversial. • This meta-analysis demonstrated that maintaining AT/AC medication was not associated with increased risk in terms of both bleeding and nondiagnostic samples. • Interruption of the AT/AC medication is not needed for safe and diagnostic FNAC for neck lesions even in patients taking AT/AC medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.