Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38536343›Full record

ArticleMilitary psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association2022

Feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of mobile cognitive control training during basic combat training in the military.

Rina Ben-Avraham, Anat Afek, Noa Berezin Cohen, Alex Davidov, Tom Van Vleet, Josh Jordan, Ariel Ben Yehudah, Yafit Gilboa, Mor Nahum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rina Ben-AvrahamSchool of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Anat AfekSchool of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Noa Berezin CohenDepartment of Health and Well-Being, Medical Corps, Israel Defense Forces (IDF), Israel.
Alex DavidovMedical Branch, Ground Forces, Israel Defense Forces (IDF), Israel.
Tom Van VleetDepartment of Research and Development, Posit Science Corporation, San Francisco, California.
Josh JordanDepartment of Psychology, Dominican University of California, San Rafael, California.
Ariel Ben YehudahDepartment of Health and Well-Being, Medical Corps, Israel Defense Forces (IDF), Israel.
Yafit GilboaSchool of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0734-3626
Mor NahumSchool of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2861-6486

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Periods of stressful events, such as those experienced during combat training in the military, may lead to psychological distress and reduced quality of life (QoL). Mental resilience, the capacity to overcome negative effects of setbacks on performance, may help protect one from the adversities associated with basic combat training. Among the factors contributing to mental resilience is cognitive control, the mechanism which helps maintain our goal directed behavior. Here we examined the feasibility of a mobile cognitive control training (CCT) app to engage young adults during their basic military training with the intention of improving resilience, mental health and QoL. 153 participants were randomly assigned to complete 2-3 weeks of either mobile CCT (n = 74) or active control training (ACT, mobile games; n = 79). Resilience, QoL, mood and self-efficacy were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Participants completed, on average, 7.28 ± 3.03 training sessions (out of the planned 14), indicating relatively low feasibility of CCT during basic combat training period and inconsistent engagement with training. In addition, there was lack of improvement in the training tasks ('target engagement'). Accordingly, no significant time by group interactions were found on any of the outcome measures, potentially due to the limited feasibility. We conclude that short-term mobile CCT has low feasibility during basic combat training and discuss the results of this study considering factors that might have contributed to the lack of feasibility of the training protocol.

Indexed as

CCTCombat trainingcomputerized cognitive control trainingmilitaryresilience

Identifiers

PMID38536343
PMCPMC10013478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.