Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38536311›Full record

ArticleMilitary psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association2022

Psychometric properties of the interpersonal needs questionnaire (INQ-15) in Army soldiers: Implications and future directions.

Emma H Moscardini, Anthony Robinson, Benjamin Trachik, Michelle L Ganulin, Matthew LoPresti, Michael N Dretsch, Matthew Calamia, Raymond P Tucker

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emma H MoscardiniDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Anthony RobinsonDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1817-559X
Benjamin TrachikUS Army Medical Research Directorate-West, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington, USA.
Michelle L GanulinUS Army Medical Research Directorate-West, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington, USA.
Matthew LoPrestiUS Army Medical Research Directorate-West, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8120-6243
Michael N DretschUS Army Medical Research Directorate-West, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8773-6376
Matthew CalamiaDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7252-7181
Raymond P TuckerDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9256-6113

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide posits that two unmet interpersonal needs, thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness, interact to predict suicide desire. These two constructs are frequently assessed using the 15-item Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ-15); however, this measure has never been validated in military service members. The current study analyzed the psychometric properties of the INQ-15 in a sample of (

Indexed as

interpersonal needsperceived burdensomenesspsychometricssuicidal ideationSuicidethwarted belongingness

Identifiers

PMID38536311
PMCPMC10013400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.