Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38536294›Full record

ArticleMilitary psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association2022

Diverse predictors of early attrition in an elite Marine training school.

Trevor J Barrett, Mona Sobhani, Glenn R Fox, Benjamin Files, Nicholas Patitsas, Josiah Duhaime, Rebecca Ebert, Rob Faulk, Leslie Saxon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Predicting ranger attrition.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Force plate assessments in reconnaissance marine training company.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Trevor J BarrettUniversity of Southern California, Center for Body Computing, Institute for Creative Technologies, California, USA.
Mona SobhaniUniversity of Southern California, Center for Body Computing, Institute for Creative Technologies, California, USA.
Glenn R FoxMarshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Benjamin FilesUS Army Combat Capabilities Development Command, Army Research Laboratory West, Maryland, USA.
Nicholas PatitsasSol Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Josiah DuhaimeUniversity of Southern California, Center for Body Computing, Institute for Creative Technologies, California, USA.
Rebecca EbertUniversity of Southern California, Center for Body Computing, Institute for Creative Technologies, California, USA.
Rob FaulkUniversity of Southern California, Center for Body Computing, Institute for Creative Technologies, California, USA.
Leslie SaxonUniversity of Southern California, Center for Body Computing, Institute for Creative Technologies, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconnaissance Marine training is deliberately difficult, to assure that graduates have the capabilities required to function successfully in the high-risk military occupational specialty. The majority of training attrition is due to voluntary withdrawal and previous research has identified certain predictive factors such as demographics, mental status, and physical performance. While some characteristics of training attrition have been identified, there is still a lack of understanding related to an individual's profile that is more apt to complete Recon training. Retrospective survey data was analyzed from 3,438 trainees within the Reconnaissance Training Company. Surveys were related to trainees' military recruitment history and other military experience, prior life experience, athletic experience, self-identified personality characteristics and motivations, and reasons for voluntary withdrawal if applicable, as well as physical performance metrics. Various demographic factors, self-reported hobbies, motivations, aquatic experience, and physical performance were associated with success in Recon Marine training courses. Subjects who voluntarily withdrew from training most commonly cited mental stress and aquatic rigor as the reason and less commonly cited reasons were physical and family reasons. These results could potentially increase training success, but more research is needed to understand the relationships between the observed trainee characteristics and success in elite warfighter training.

Indexed as

Human PerformanceMilitarySuccess FactorsTraining

Identifiers

PMID38536294
PMCPMC10013366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.