Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38536289›Full record

ArticleMilitary psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association2022

Stereotyping of student service members and Veterans on a university campus in the U.S.

Thomas C Motl, Kylie A George, Brandon J Gibson, Maria A Mollenhauer, Lindsay Birke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas C MotlDepartment of Psychology and Sociology, College of St. Scholastica, Duluth, Minnesota.
Kylie A GeorgeEducation, Health, and Behavior Studies, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota.
Brandon J GibsonEducation, Health, and Behavior Studies, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota.
Maria A MollenhauerEducation, Health, and Behavior Studies, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota.
Lindsay BirkeEducation, Health, and Behavior Studies, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies about the experience of Student Service Members and Veterans (SSM/Vs) at U.S. institutions of higher education have consistently found that SSM/Vs believe that their military status results in stereotyping by peers. This is the first study to use quantitative methods to examine 1) the stereotypes SSM/Vs believe exist about them, and 2) the stereotypes actually displayed by non-SSM/V peers. A survey was administered to 177 students (87 SSM/Vs and 90 non-SSM/Vs) at a large, four-year university in the Midwest United States. Explicit questions and an experimental manipulation were used to address the research questions. Findings suggest that SSM/Vs believe more negative stereotypes exist than do non-SSM/Vs. Further, of 48 attributes used as options, the current methodology uncovered evidence of 6 specific stereotypes that non-SSM/Vs hold about SSM/Vs: disciplined, leader, masculine, mentally ill, stuck in the past, and tense. These results can guide future research about SSM/V transition to higher education, and address specific barriers to the well-being of this population.

Indexed as

college climatestereotypesstigmastudent service membersStudent Veterans

Identifiers

PMID38536289
PMCPMC10013355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.