Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38535837›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2024

Exploring the Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning in an International Undergraduate Program in Veterinary Sciences: Students' Satisfaction, Experience and Learning.

Anna Broseghini, Miina Lõoke, Marta Brscic, Juliana Raffaghelli, Barbara Cardazzo, Antonella Lotti, Laura Cavicchioli, Lieta Marinelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna BroseghiniDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, Università degli Studi di Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8795-6237
Miina LõokeDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, Università degli Studi di Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.
Marta BrscicDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, Università degli Studi di Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8366-5961
Juliana RaffaghelliDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied Psychology, Università degli Studi di Padova, Via Beato Pellegrino 28, 35137 Padova, Italy.
Barbara CardazzoDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, Università degli Studi di Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.
Antonella LottiDepartment of Humanities, Letters, Cultural Heritage and Educational Studies, Università di Foggia, Via Arpi 176, 71121 Foggia, Italy.
Laura CavicchioliDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, Università degli Studi di Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2845-0244
Lieta MarinelliDepartment of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, Università degli Studi di Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0609-2172
University of Padua · ITUniversity of Foggia · IT

Funding

Italian Ministry of University and Research Green Themes, DM1061/202University of Padua Design Effective Learning Experiences in Innovative Teaching Projects
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The systematic evaluation of the integration of problem-based learning (PBL) into educational programs in Italy is scarce and there are no published reports of its use in an Italian Bachelor of Veterinary Science degree program. This paper aims to assess the satisfaction of second-year students on an international Bachelor of Veterinary Science degree program after implementing two weeks of PBL with a multidisciplinary approach. Moreover, the impact of this methodological approach on the students' performance and their perceptions concerning their learning experience was investigated. The results showed that students expressed a high level of satisfaction and a positive attitude towards learning through PBL. A significant increase in the perception of students' soft skills was also found, based on self-evaluation. Moreover, a significant improvement was seen in the students' perception of their learning and teaching experiences and general life competencies, assessed using the validated questionnaire HowULearn. Negative effects were also identified, requiring further design modification of the tutors' feedback and pedagogical orchestration. Based on our findings, when planning bachelor's degree programs in veterinary science, PBL modules or activities should be considered to promote active learning, engagement among students, and the improvement of problem-solving and team-working skills.

Indexed as

HowULearninternational studentsPBLpedagogical planningproblem-based learningsoft skillsstudent-centered teachingtutor evaluation

Identifiers

PMID38535837
PMCPMC10974726
OpenAlexW4392188793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.