Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38535765›Full record

ReviewVision (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy-Review.

Christopher Way, Mohamed Gamal Elghobaier, Mayank A Nanavaty

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. One-Year Visual and Refractive Outcomes of SmartPulseJournal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Refractive Surgery in Myopic Children.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher WayUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Eastern Road, Brighton BN2 5BF, UK.
Mohamed Gamal ElghobaierUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Eastern Road, Brighton BN2 5BF, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4420-3937
Mayank A NanavatyUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Eastern Road, Brighton BN2 5BF, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0667-3700
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust · GBBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The type and nature of refractive surgery procedures has greatly increased over the past few decades, allowing for almost all patient populations to be treated to extremely high satisfaction. Conventional photorefractive keratectomy involves the removal of the corneal epithelium through mechanical debridement or dilute alcohol instillation. An improvement to this method utilises laser epithelial removal in a single-step process termed transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (transPRK). We explore the history of transPRK from its early adoption as a two-step process, identify different transPRK platforms from major manufacturers, and describe the role of transPRK in the refractive surgery armamentarium. This is a narrative review of the literature. This review finds that TransPRK is a safe and effective procedure that works across a variety of patient populations. Though often not seen as a primary treatment option when compared to other corneal-based procedures that offer a faster and more comfortable recovery, there are many scenarios in which these procedures are not possible. These include, but are not limited to, cases of corneal instability, previous refractive surgery, or transplant where higher-order aberrations can impair vision in a manner not amenable to spectacle or contact lens correction. We discuss refinements to the procedure that would help improve outcomes, including optimising patient discomfort after surgery as well as reducing corneal haze and refractive regression.

Indexed as

excimer laserphotorefractive keratectomyPRKtransepithelialtransPRK

Identifiers

PMID38535765
PMCPMC10974391
OpenAlexW4393042133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.