Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38535763›Full record

ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Automated Analysis Pipeline for Extracting Saccade, Pupil, and Blink Parameters Using Video-Based Eye Tracking.

Brian C Coe, Jeff Huang, Donald C Brien, Brian J White, Rachel Yep, Douglas P Munoz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Interleaved Pro/Anti-saccade Behavior Across the Lifespan.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brian C CoeCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3985-0163
Jeff HuangCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7390-0697
Donald C BrienCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Brian J WhiteCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Rachel YepSunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Douglas P MunozCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5362-8203

Funding

CIHR MOP-FDN-148418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tremendous increase in the use of video-based eye tracking has made it possible to collect eye tracking data from thousands of participants. The traditional procedures for the manual detection and classification of saccades and for trial categorization (e.g., correct vs. incorrect) are not viable for the large datasets being collected. Additionally, video-based eye trackers allow for the analysis of pupil responses and blink behaviors. Here, we present a detailed description of our pipeline for collecting, storing, and cleaning data, as well as for organizing participant codes, which are fairly lab-specific but nonetheless, are important precursory steps in establishing standardized pipelines. More importantly, we also include descriptions of the automated detection and classification of saccades, blinks, "blincades" (blinks occurring during saccades), and boomerang saccades (two nearly simultaneous saccades in opposite directions where speed-based algorithms fail to split them), This is almost entirely task-agnostic and can be used on a wide variety of data. We additionally describe novel findings regarding post-saccadic oscillations and provide a method to achieve more accurate estimates for saccade end points. Lastly, we describe the automated behavior classification for the interleaved pro/anti-saccade task (IPAST), a task that probes voluntary and inhibitory control. This pipeline was evaluated using data collected from 592 human participants between 5 and 93 years of age, making it robust enough to handle large clinical patient datasets. In summary, this pipeline has been optimized to consistently handle large datasets obtained from diverse study cohorts (i.e., developmental, aging, clinical) and collected across multiple laboratory sites.

Indexed as

automated blink classificationautomated saccade classificationautomated trial markingblincadesblinkboomerang saccadespost saccadic oscillationspost-saccadic sloshpupilpupil sizesaccadevideo-based eye tracking

Identifiers

PMID38535763
PMCPMC10975925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.