Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38535567›Full record

ReviewPathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Inactivated Poliovirus Vaccine: Recent Developments and the Tortuous Path to Global Acceptance.

Roland W Sutter, Martin Eisenhawer, Natalia A Molodecky, Harish Verma, Hiromasa Okayasu

Open access · goldAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Roland W SutterTamayo Federal Solutions LLC, Virginia Beach, VA 23452, USA.
Martin EisenhawerPolio Eradication Department, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Natalia A MolodeckyPolio Surge Capacity Support Program, The Task Force for Global Health, Inc., Decatur, GE 30030, USA.
Harish VermaPolio Eradication Department, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Hiromasa OkayasuDivision of Healthy Environments and Population, Regional Office for the Western Pacific, World Health Organization, Manila 1000, Philippines.
World Health Organization · CHRho (United States) · USThe Task Force for Global Health · USWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific · PH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV), available since 1955, became the first vaccine to be used to protect against poliomyelitis. While the immunogenicity of IPV to prevent paralytic poliomyelitis continues to be irrefutable, its requirement for strong containment (due to large quantities of live virus used in the manufacturing process), perceived lack of ability to induce intestinal mucosal immunity, high cost and increased complexity to administer compared to oral polio vaccine (OPV), have limited its use in the global efforts to eradicate poliomyelitis. In order to harvest the full potential of IPV, a program of work has been carried out by the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI) over the past two decades that has focused on: (1) increasing the scientific knowledge base of IPV; (2) translating new insights and evidence into programmatic action; (3) expanding the IPV manufacturing infrastructure for global demand; and (4) continuing to pursue an ambitious research program to develop more immunogenic and safer-to-produce vaccines. While the knowledge base of IPV continues to expand, further research and product development are necessary to ensure that the program priorities are met (e.g., non-infectious production through virus-like particles, non-transmissible vaccine inducing humoral and intestinal mucosal immunity and new methods for house-to-house administration through micro-needle patches and jet injectors), the discussions have largely moved from whether to how to use this vaccine most effectively. In this review, we summarize recent developments on expanding the science base of IPV and provide insight into policy development and the expansion of IPV manufacturing and production, and finally we provide an update on the current priorities.

Indexed as

PoliomyelitisPoliovirus Vaccine, InactivatedDisease EradicationGlobal HealthHumansPoliovirusPoliovirus Vaccine, Inactivatedfractional-dose IPV (fIPV)Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI)inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV)mucosal immunity

Identifiers

PMID38535567
PMCPMC10974833
OpenAlexW4392382258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.