Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38535525›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2025

Drought stress influences foraging preference of a solitary bee on two wildflowers.

Annika Rose-Person, Louis S Santiago, Nicole E Rafferty

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Annika Rose-PersonDepartment of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, University of California, Riverside, 900 University Avenue, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Louis S SantiagoDepartment of Botany & Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, 900 University Avenue, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5994-6122
Nicole E RaffertyDepartment of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, University of California, Riverside, 900 University Avenue, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
University of California, Riverside · US

Funding

Center for Conservation Biology Shipley-Skinner Reserve Riverside County Endowment and the Environmental Dynamics and GeoEcology Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPollinators provide critical ecosystem services, maintaining biodiversity and benefitting global food production. However, plants, pollinators and their mutualistic interactions can be affected by drought, which has increased in severity and frequency under climate change. Using two annual, insect-pollinated wildflowers (Phacelia campanularia and Nemophila menziesii), we asked how drought impacts floral traits and foraging preferences of a solitary bee (Osmia lignaria) and explored potential implications for plant reproduction.

methodsIn greenhouses, we subjected plants experimentally to drought to induce water stress, as verified by leaf water potential. To assess the impact of drought on floral traits, we measured flower size, floral display size, nectar volume and nectar sugar concentration. To explore how drought-induced effects on floral traits affected bee foraging preferences, we performed choice trials. Individual female bees were placed into foraging arenas with two conspecific plants, one droughted and one non-droughted, and were allowed to forage freely. KEY

resultsWe determined that P. campanularia is more drought tolerant than N. menziesii, based on measures of turgor loss point, and confirmed that droughted plants were more drought stressed than non-droughted plants. For droughted plants of both species, the floral display size was reduced and the flowers were smaller and produced less, more-concentrated nectar. We found that bees preferred non-droughted flowers of N. menziesii. However, bee preference for non-droughted P. campanularia flowers depended on the time of day and was detected only in the afternoon.

conclusionsOur findings indicate that bees prefer to visit non-droughted flowers, probably reducing pollination success for drought-stressed plants. Lack of preference for non-droughted P. campanularia flowers in the morning might reflect the higher drought tolerance of this species. This work highlights the potentially intersecting, short-term physiological and pollinator behavioural responses to drought and suggests that such responses might reshape plant-pollinator interactions, ultimately reducing reproductive output for less drought-tolerant wildflowers.

Indexed as

DroughtsAnimalsBeesFeeding BehaviorFemaleFlowersPlant NectarPollinationStress, PhysiologicalPlant Nectarbeesclimate changedroughtflower sizeforaging behaviournectarNemophila menziesiiOsmia lignariaPhacelia campanulariaplant–pollinator interactionspollinationpollinator preference

Identifiers

PMID38535525
PMCPMC11805950
OpenAlexW4393220925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.