Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38535490›Full record

ArticleJournal of xenobiotics2023

The Genotoxicity of Organic Extracts from Particulate Emissions Produced by Neat Gasoline (E0) and a Gasoline-Ethanol Blend (E15) in BEAS-2B Cells.

Helena Libalova, Tana Zavodna, Fatima Elzeinova, Hana Barosova, Tereza Cervena, Alena Milcova, Jolana Vankova, Foteini Paradeisi, Michal Vojtisek-Lom, Jitka Sikorova and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of xenobiotics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Helena LibalovaDepartment of Nanotoxicology and Molecular Epidemiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the CAS, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.
Tana ZavodnaDepartment of Genetic Toxicology and Epigenetics, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the CAS, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-1482-9341
Fatima ElzeinovaDepartment of Nanotoxicology and Molecular Epidemiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the CAS, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.
Hana BarosovaDepartment of Genetic Toxicology and Epigenetics, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the CAS, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.
Tereza CervenaDepartment of Nanotoxicology and Molecular Epidemiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the CAS, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9248-2761
Alena MilcovaDepartment of Genetic Toxicology and Epigenetics, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the CAS, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.
Jolana VankovaDepartment of Nanotoxicology and Molecular Epidemiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the CAS, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.
Foteini ParadeisiDepartment of Genetic Toxicology and Epigenetics, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the CAS, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-0870-1488
Michal Vojtisek-LomCentre of Vehicles for Sustainable Mobility, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, 16000 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-8807-0921
Jitka SikorovaDepartment of Genetic Toxicology and Epigenetics, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the CAS, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan TopinkaDepartment of Genetic Toxicology and Epigenetics, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the CAS, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel RossnerDepartment of Nanotoxicology and Molecular Epidemiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine of the CAS, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-6921-5446
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Medicine · CZCzech Technical University in Prague · CZ

Funding

Czech Science Foundation 18-06548YMinistry of Education Youth and Sports CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_013/0001821Ministry of Education Youth and Sports LM2018124Ministry of Education Youth and Sports LM2023053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emissions from modern gasoline engines represent an environmental and health risk. In this study, we aimed to compare the toxicity of organic compound mixtures extracted from particulate matter (PM extracts) produced by neat gasoline (E0) and a blend containing 15% ethanol (E15), which is offered as an alternative to non-renewable fossil fuels. Human lung BEAS-2B cells were exposed to PM extracts, and biomarkers of genotoxicity, such as DNA damage evaluated by comet assay, micronuclei formation, levels of phosphorylated histone H2AX, the expression of genes relevant to the DNA damage response, and exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), were determined. Results showed that both PM extracts significantly increased the level of oxidized DNA lesions. The E0 extract exhibited a more pronounced effect, possibly due to the higher content of nitrated PAHs. Other endpoints were not substantially affected by any of the PM extracts. Gene expression analysis revealed mild but coordinated induction of genes related to DNA damage response, and a strong induction of PAH-inducible genes, indicating activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). Our data suggest that the addition of ethanol into the gasoline diminished the oxidative DNA damage, but no effect on other genotoxicity biomarkers was observed. Activated AhR may play an important role in the toxicity of gasoline PM emissions.

Indexed as

alternative fuelsgasoline particulate emissionsgenotoxicityhuman pulmonary cell lineorganic PM extractspolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Identifiers

PMID38535490
PMCPMC10970876
OpenAlexW4390059963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.