Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38535404›Full record

ArticleInsects2024

Examining Innovative Technologies: Nano-Chelated Fertilizers for Management of Wheat Aphid (

Masoud Chamani, Bahram Naseri, Hooshang Rafiee-Dastjerdi, Javid Emaratpardaz, Reza Farshbaf Pourabad, Ali Chenari Bouket, Tomasz Oszako, Lassaad Belbahri

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Masoud ChamaniDepartment of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil 5619911367, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-7241-1384
Bahram NaseriDepartment of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil 5619911367, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5821-0957
Hooshang Rafiee-DastjerdiDepartment of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil 5619911367, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-1278-2858
Javid EmaratpardazDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz 5137779619, Iran.
Reza Farshbaf PourabadDepartment of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Ege University, 35100 Izmir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-3303-0236
Ali Chenari BouketEast Azarbaijan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Centre, Plant Protection Research Department, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tabriz 5355179854, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-8421-1758
Tomasz OszakoInstitute of Forest Sciences, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, Wiejska 45E, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4688-2582
Lassaad BelbahriUniversity Institute of Teacher Education (IUFE), University of Geneva, 24 Rue du Général-Dufour, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7040-4500

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of nanofertilizers has both advantages and concerns. One benefit is that nano-fertilizers can enhance plant resistance against insect pests, making them a valuable strategy in integrated pest management (IPM). This study focused on the effect of wheat leaves treated with nano-chelated fertilizers and nitrogen (N) fertilizer on the wheat aphid (

Indexed as

IPMlife tablepopulation growthSchizaphis graminum

Identifiers

PMID38535404
PMCPMC10970919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.