Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38535394›Full record

ArticleInsects2024

Comparative Morphology of the Wing Base Structure Illuminates Higher-Level Phylogeny of Holometabola.

Chenjing Zhao, Mengting Huang, Ding Yang, Xingyue Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chenjing ZhaoDepartment of Biology, Taiyuan Normal University, Jinzhong 030619, China.
Mengting HuangDepartment of Biology, Taiyuan Normal University, Jinzhong 030619, China.
Ding YangDepartment of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Xingyue LiuDepartment of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9168-0659

Funding

Foundation for the Graduate Student Innovation Program SYYJSJG-2203, SYYJSYC-2324National Natural Science Foundation of China 32130012, 32100359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogenetic relationships among Holometabola have been the subject of controversy. The value of the wing base structure in phylogenetic analysis has been demonstrated but remains largely underexplored and scarce in studies of Holometabola. We studied the phylogenetic relationships among Holometabola (excluding Siphonaptera), focusing exclusively on wing base structure. Cladistic assessments were conducted using 53 morphological data points derived from the bases of both the forewing and hindwing. The results of wing base data revealed a sister relationship between Hymenoptera and remaining orders. The sister-group relationships between Strepsiptera and Coleoptera, Mecoptera and Diptera, Trichoptera and Lepidoptera, and Neuropterida and Coleopterida were corroborated. In Neuropterida, our results recovered the sister relationship between Megaloptera and Neuroptera, as well as the monophyly of Megaloptera.

Indexed as

cladistic analysesHolometabolamorphological studywing base

Identifiers

PMID38535394
PMCPMC10970979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.