Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38535333›Full record

ReviewMetabolites2024

Matrix- and Surface-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry Methods for Urological Cancer Biomarker Discovery-Metabolomics and Lipidomics Approaches.

Adrian Arendowski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Metabolites, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adrian ArendowskiCentre for Modern Interdisciplinary Technologies, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Wileńska 4, 87-100 Toruń, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8496-6800
Nicolaus Copernicus University · PL

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education 0184/DIA/2016/45
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary tract cancers, including those of the bladder, the kidneys, and the prostate, represent over 12% of all cancers, with significant global incidence and mortality rates. The continuous challenge that these cancers present necessitates the development of innovative diagnostic and prognostic methods, such as identifying specific biomarkers indicative of cancer. Biomarkers, which can be genes, proteins, metabolites, or lipids, are vital for various clinical purposes including early detection and prognosis. Mass spectrometry (MS), particularly soft ionization techniques such as electrospray ionization (ESI) and laser desorption/ionization (LDI), has emerged as a key tool in metabolic profiling for biomarker discovery, due to its high resolution, sensitivity, and ability to analyze complex biological samples. Among the LDI techniques, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) and surface-assisted laser desorption/ionization (SALDI) should be mentioned. While MALDI methodology, which uses organic compounds as matrices, is effective for larger molecules, SALDI, based on the various types of nanoparticles and nanostructures, is preferred for smaller metabolites and lipids due to its reduced spectral interference. This study highlights the application of LDI techniques, along with mass spectrometry imaging (MSI), in identifying potential metabolic and lipid biomarkers for urological cancers, focusing on the most common bladder, kidney, and prostate cancers.

Indexed as

biomarkersbladder cancerkidney cancerlipidsmass spectrometrymatrix-assisted laser desorption/ionizationmetabolitesprostate cancersurface-assisted laser desorption/ionization

Identifiers

PMID38535333
PMCPMC10972240
OpenAlexW4393003587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.