Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38535315›Full record

ReviewMetabolites2024

Machine Learning to Predict Enzyme-Substrate Interactions in Elucidation of Synthesis Pathways: A Review.

Luis F Salas-Nuñez, Alvaro Barrera-Ocampo, Paola A Caicedo, Natalie Cortes, Edison H Osorio, Maria F Villegas-Torres, Andres F González Barrios

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Metabolites, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Non-canonical plant metabolism.Nature plants · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luis F Salas-NuñezGrupo de Diseño de Productos y Procesos (GDPP), Department of Chemical and Food Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá 111711, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-7335-3523
Alvaro Barrera-OcampoGrupo Natura, Facultad de Ingeniería, Diseño y Ciencias Aplicadas, Departamento de Ciencias Farmacéuticas y Químicas, Universidad ICESI, Calle 18 No. 122-135, Cali 760031, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-0906-9293
Paola A CaicedoGrupo Natura, Facultad de Ingeniería, Diseño y Ciencias Aplicadas, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Bioprocesos y Biotecnología, Universidad ICESI, Calle 18 No. 122-135, Cali 760031, Colombia.
Natalie CortesGrupo de Investigación en Química Bioorgánica y Sistemas Moleculares (QBOSMO), Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Universidad de Ibagué, Ibagué 730002, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-8895-6282
Edison H OsorioGrupo de Investigación en Química Bioorgánica y Sistemas Moleculares (QBOSMO), Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Universidad de Ibagué, Ibagué 730002, Colombia.
Maria F Villegas-TorresCentro de Investigaciones Microbiológicas (CIMIC), Department of Biological Sciences, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá 111711, Colombia.
Andres F González BarriosGrupo de Diseño de Productos y Procesos (GDPP), Department of Chemical and Food Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá 111711, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-2517-2020

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación 86978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enzyme-substrate interactions play a fundamental role in elucidating synthesis pathways and synthetic biology, as they allow for the understanding of important aspects of a reaction. Establishing the interaction experimentally is a slow and costly process, which is why this problem has been addressed using computational methods such as molecular dynamics, molecular docking, and Monte Carlo simulations. Nevertheless, this type of method tends to be computationally slow when dealing with a large search space. Therefore, in recent years, methods based on artificial intelligence, such as support vector machines, neural networks, or decision trees, have been implemented, significantly reducing the computing time and covering vast search spaces. These methods significantly reduce the computation time and cover broad search spaces, rapidly reducing the number of interacting candidates, as they allow repetitive processes to be automated and patterns to be extracted, are adaptable, and have the capacity to handle large amounts of data. This article analyzes these artificial intelligence-based approaches, presenting their common structure, advantages, disadvantages, limitations, challenges, and future perspectives.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecomputational studiesenzyme classificationenzyme–substrate interactionmolecular descriptorssynthesis routestraining data

Identifiers

PMID38535315
PMCPMC10972002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.