Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38535153›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2024

Data Fusion of RGB and Depth Data with Image Enhancement.

Lennard Wunsch, Christian Görner Tenorio, Katharina Anding, Andrei Golomoz, Gunther Notni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lennard WunschGroup of Quality Assurance and Industrial Image Processing, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1848-6091
Christian Görner TenorioGroup of Quality Assurance and Industrial Image Processing, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-7280-1868
Katharina AndingGroup of Quality Assurance and Industrial Image Processing, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany.
Andrei GolomozGroup of Quality Assurance and Industrial Image Processing, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany.
Gunther NotniGroup of Quality Assurance and Industrial Image Processing, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7532-1560

Funding

Projektträger Jülich KZ03RU1U151C, FKZ03RU1U152C and FKZ03RU1U153C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 3D sensors became popular, imaged depth data are easier to obtain in the consumer sector. In applications such as defect localization on industrial objects or mass/volume estimation, precise depth data is important and, thus, benefits from the usage of multiple information sources. However, a combination of RGB images and depth images can not only improve our understanding of objects, capacitating one to gain more information about objects but also enhance data quality. Combining different camera systems using data fusion can enable higher quality data since disadvantages can be compensated. Data fusion itself consists of data preparation and data registration. A challenge in data fusion is the different resolutions of sensors. Therefore, up- and downsampling algorithms are needed. This paper compares multiple up- and downsampling methods, such as different direct interpolation methods, joint bilateral upsampling (JBU), and Markov random fields (MRFs), in terms of their potential to create RGB-D images and improve the quality of depth information. In contrast to the literature in which imaging systems are adjusted to acquire the data of the same section simultaneously, the laboratory setup in this study was based on conveyor-based optical sorting processes, and therefore, the data were acquired at different time periods and different spatial locations. Data assignment and data cropping were necessary. In order to evaluate the results, root mean square error (RMSE), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), correlation (CORR), universal quality index (UQI), and the contour offset are monitored. With JBU outperforming the other upsampling methods, achieving a meanRMSE = 25.22, mean SNR = 32.80, mean CORR = 0.99, and mean UQI = 0.97.

Indexed as

data enhancementdata fusionjoint bilateral upsamplingMarkov random fieldsmultimodal imagingregistrationRGB-D

Identifiers

PMID38535153
PMCPMC10971075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.