Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38535152›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2024

Analyzing Data Modalities for Cattle Weight Estimation Using Deep Learning Models.

Hina Afridi, Mohib Ullah, Øyvind Nordbø, Solvei Cottis Hoff, Siri Furre, Anne Guro Larsgard, Faouzi Alaya Cheikh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recent Advances in Vision-Based Beef Cattle Body Measurement Technologies.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hina AfridiDepartment of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2815 Gjøvik, Norway.
Mohib UllahDepartment of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2815 Gjøvik, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0222-6340
Øyvind NordbøNorsvin SA, Storhamargata 44, 2317 Hamar, Norway.
Solvei Cottis HoffTYR SA, Storhamargata 44, 2317 Hamar, Norway.
Siri FurreTYR SA, Storhamargata 44, 2317 Hamar, Norway.
Anne Guro LarsgardGeno SA, Storhamargata 44, 2317 Hamar, Norway.
Faouzi Alaya CheikhDepartment of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2815 Gjøvik, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigate the impact of different data modalities for cattle weight estimation. For this purpose, we collect and present our own cattle dataset representing the data modalities: RGB, depth, combined RGB and depth, segmentation, and combined segmentation and depth information. We explore a recent vision-transformer-based zero-shot model proposed by Meta AI Research for producing the segmentation data modality and for extracting the cattle-only region from the images. For experimental analysis, we consider three baseline deep learning models. The objective is to assess how the integration of diverse data sources influences the accuracy and robustness of the deep learning models considering four different performance metrics: mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and

Indexed as

cattle weight estimationdata modalitiesdeep learning modelsdepth informationsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID38535152
PMCPMC10971323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.