ArticleJournal of imaging2024
Enhancing Deep Edge Detection through Normalized Hadamard-Product Fusion.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimized Lung Nodule Classification Using CLAHE-Enhanced CT Imaging and Swin Transformer-Based Deep Feature Extraction.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- DGA-Net: a dual-branch group aggregation network for liver tumor segmentation in medical images.Frontiers in medical technology · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Edge Detection Operators Using a Threshold Estimation Approach on Medical Noisy Images with Different Complexities.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep edge detection is challenging, especially with the existing methods, like HED (holistic edge detection). These methods combine multiple feature side outputs (SOs) to create the final edge map, but they neglect diverse edge importance within one output. This creates a problem: to include desired edges, unwanted noise must also be accepted. As a result, the output often has increased noise or thick edges, ignoring important boundaries. To address this, we propose a new approach called the normalized Hadamard-product (NHP) operation-based deep network for edge detection. By multiplying the side outputs from the backbone network, the Hadamard-product operation encourages agreement among features across different scales while suppressing disagreed weak signals. This method produces additional Mutually Agreed Salient Edge (MASE) maps to enrich the hierarchical level of side outputs without adding complexity. Our experiments demonstrate that the NHP operation significantly improves performance, e.g., an ODS score reaching 0.818 on BSDS500, outperforming human performance (0.803), achieving state-of-the-art results in deep edge detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.