ArticleJournal of imaging2024
An Improved Path-Finding Method for the Tracking of Centerlines of Tortuous Internal Carotid Arteries in MR Angiography.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning for high-resolution magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging: image reconstruction, stenosis diagnosis and plaque calculation.European radiology · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Age Prediction with Feature Subset Selection from Magnetic Resonance Angiography Data.Healthcare informatics research · 2025Article
- Vessel Geometry Estimation for Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Centerline tracking is useful in performing segmental analysis of vessel tortuosity in angiography data. However, a highly tortuous) artery can produce multiple centerlines due to over-segmentation of the artery, resulting in inaccurate path-finding results when using the shortest path-finding algorithm. In this study, the internal carotid arteries (ICAs) from three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF MRA) data were used to demonstrate the effectiveness of a new path-finding method. The method is based on a series of depth-first searches (DFSs) with randomly different orders of neighborhood searches and produces an appropriate path connecting the two endpoints in the ICAs. It was compared with three existing methods which were (a) DFS with a sequential order of neighborhood search, (b) Dijkstra algorithm, and (c) A* algorithm. The path-finding accuracy was evaluated by counting the number of successful paths. The method resulted in an accuracy of 95.8%, outperforming the three existing methods. In conclusion, the proposed method has been shown to be more suitable as a path-finding procedure than the existing methods, particularly in cases where there is more than one centerline resulting from over-segmentation of a highly tortuous artery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.