Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38535052›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Automatic Active Lesion Tracking in Multiple Sclerosis Using Unsupervised Machine Learning.

Jason Uwaeze, Ponnada A Narayana, Arash Kamali, Vladimir Braverman, Michael A Jacobs, Alireza Akhbardeh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. AI in Medical Imaging and Image Processing.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jason UwaezeDepartment of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Ponnada A NarayanaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Arash KamaliDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Vladimir BravermanDepartment of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.
Michael A JacobsDepartment of Computer Science, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1125-1644
Alireza AkhbardehDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-2971-781X
Rice University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying active lesions in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for the diagnosis and treatment planning of multiple sclerosis (MS). Active lesions on MRI are identified following the administration of Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs). However, recent studies have reported that repeated administration of GBCA results in the accumulation of Gd in tissues. In addition, GBCA administration increases health care costs. Thus, reducing or eliminating GBCA administration for active lesion detection is important for improved patient safety and reduced healthcare costs. Current state-of-the-art methods for identifying active lesions in brain MRI without GBCA administration utilize data-intensive deep learning methods.

objectiveTo implement nonlinear dimensionality reduction (NLDR) methods, locally linear embedding (LLE) and isometric feature mapping (Isomap), which are less data-intensive, for automatically identifying active lesions on brain MRI in MS patients, without the administration of contrast agents. MATERIALS AND

methodsFluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), T2-weighted, proton density-weighted, and pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted images were included in the multiparametric MRI dataset used in this study. Subtracted pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted images were labeled by experts as active lesions (ground truth). Unsupervised methods, LLE and Isomap, were used to reconstruct multiparametric brain MR images into a single embedded image. Active lesions were identified on the embedded images and compared with ground truth lesions. The performance of NLDR methods was evaluated by calculating the Dice similarity (DS) index between the observed and identified active lesions in embedded images.

resultsLLE and Isomap, were applied to 40 MS patients, achieving median DS scores of 0.74 ± 0.1 and 0.78 ± 0.09, respectively, outperforming current state-of-the-art methods.

conclusionsNLDR methods, Isomap and LLE, are viable options for the identification of active MS lesions on non-contrast images, and potentially could be used as a clinical decision tool.

Indexed as

dimensionality reductionlesion segmentationmultiparametric MRImultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID38535052
PMCPMC10969435
OpenAlexW4392918835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.