Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38534998›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Deep Learning-Based Prediction Model for Gait Recovery after a Spinal Cord Injury.

Hyun-Joon Yoo, Kwang-Sig Lee, Bummo Koo, Chan-Woo Yong, Chae-Won Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. IShuffleNet-PCNN hybrid classifier within an MResU-Net-based framework for spinal cord injury detection and classification using CT images.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hyun-Joon YooKorea University Research Institute for Medical Bigdata Science, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3610-1765
Kwang-Sig LeeAI Center, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0576-0098
Bummo KooSchool of Health and Environmental Science, Korea University College of Health Science, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Chan-Woo YongSchool of Health and Environmental Science, Korea University College of Health Science, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Chae-Won KimSchool of Health and Environmental Science, Korea University College of Health Science, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education 2022R1I1A1A01059442the Korea Health Industry Development Institute grant (Korea Health Technology R&D Project) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare of South Korea No. HI22C1302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting gait recovery after a spinal cord injury (SCI) during an acute rehabilitation phase is important for planning rehabilitation strategies. However, few studies have been conducted on this topic to date. In this study, we developed a deep learning-based prediction model for gait recovery after SCI upon discharge from an acute rehabilitation facility. Data were collected from 405 patients with acute SCI admitted to the acute rehabilitation facility of Korea University Anam Hospital between June 2008 and December 2022. The dependent variable was Functional Ambulation Category at the time of discharge (FAC-DC). Seventy-one independent variables were selected from the existing literature: basic information, International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI scores, neurogenic bladders, initial FAC, and somatosensory-evoked potentials of the lower extremity. Recurrent neural network (RNN), linear regression (LR), Ridge, and Lasso methods were compared for FAC-DC prediction in terms of the root-mean-squared error (RMSE). RNN variable importance, which is the RMSE gap between a complete RNN model and an RNN model excluding a certain variable, was used to evaluate the contribution of this variable. Based on the results of this study, the performance of the RNN was far better than that of LR, Ridge, and Lasso. The respective RMSEs were 0.3738, 2.2831, 1.3161, and 1.0246 for all the participants; 0.3727, 1.7176, 1.3914, and 1.3524 for those with trauma; and 0.3728, 1.7516, 1.1012, and 0.8889 for those without trauma. In terms of RNN variable importance, lower-extremity motor strength (right and left ankle dorsiflexors, right knee extensors, and left long toe extensors) and the neurological level of injury were ranked among the top five across the boards. Therefore, initial FAC was the seventh, third, and ninth most important predictor for all participants, those with trauma, and those without trauma, respectively. In conclusion, this study developed a deep learning-based prediction model with excellent performance for gait recovery after SCI at the time of discharge from an acute rehabilitation facility. This study also demonstrated the strength of deep learning as an explainable artificial intelligence method for identifying the most important predictors.

Indexed as

deep learningLassolinear regressionpredictionrecurrent neural networkRidgesomatosensory evoked potentialspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID38534998
PMCPMC10969139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.