Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38534904›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2024

ChatGPT's Response Consistency: A Study on Repeated Queries of Medical Examination Questions.

Paul F Funk, Cosima C Hoch, Samuel Knoedler, Leonard Knoedler, Sebastian Cotofana, Giuseppe Sofo, Ali Bashiri Dezfouli, Barbara Wollenberg, Orlando Guntinas-Lichius, Michael Alfertshofer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. AI in respiratory care: findings from the GOLD report.Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Paul F FunkDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-4316-4249
Cosima C HochDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3875-7389
Samuel KnoedlerDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Leonard KnoedlerDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Sebastian CotofanaDepartment of Dermatology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Giuseppe SofoInstituto Ivo Pitanguy, Hospital Santa Casa de Misericórdia Rio de Janeiro, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 20020-022, Brazil.
Ali Bashiri DezfouliDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Barbara WollenbergDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3062-459X
Orlando Guntinas-LichiusDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9671-0784
Michael AlfertshoferDepartment of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: As the field of artificial intelligence (AI) evolves, tools like ChatGPT are increasingly integrated into various domains of medicine, including medical education and research. Given the critical nature of medicine, it is of paramount importance that AI tools offer a high degree of reliability in the information they provide. (2) Methods: A total of

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceChatGPTindecisivenessmedical state examination questionsresponse consistency

Identifiers

PMID38534904
PMCPMC10969490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.