Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38534901›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2024

The Effects of Nature Exposure Therapies on Stress, Depression, and Anxiety Levels: A Systematic Review.

Diana Marcela Paredes-Céspedes, Norida Vélez, Alejandra Parada-López, Yesith Guillermo Toloza-Pérez, Eliana M Téllez, Claudia Portilla, Carolina González, Leany Blandón, Juan Carlos Santacruz, Jeadran Malagón-Rojas

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Forest bathing (Frontiers in public health · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Diana Marcela Paredes-CéspedesGrupo de Salud Ambiental y Laboral, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Dirección de Investigación, Bogotá 111321, Colombia.
Norida VélezGrupo de Salud Ambiental y Laboral, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Dirección de Investigación, Bogotá 111321, Colombia.
Alejandra Parada-LópezGrupo de Salud Ambiental y Laboral, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Dirección de Investigación, Bogotá 111321, Colombia.
Yesith Guillermo Toloza-PérezGrupo de Salud Ambiental y Laboral, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Dirección de Investigación, Bogotá 111321, Colombia.
Eliana M TéllezGrupo de Salud Ambiental y Laboral, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Dirección de Investigación, Bogotá 111321, Colombia.
Claudia PortillaGrupo de Salud Ambiental y Laboral, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Dirección de Investigación, Bogotá 111321, Colombia.
Carolina GonzálezFundación Colombiana del Corazón, Bogotá 111311, Colombia.
Leany BlandónFundación Colombiana del Corazón, Bogotá 111311, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-4861-2079
Juan Carlos SantacruzFundación Colombiana del Corazón, Bogotá 111311, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-7268-4366
Jeadran Malagón-RojasGrupo de Salud Ambiental y Laboral, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Dirección de Investigación, Bogotá 111321, Colombia.
Instituto Nacional de Salud · COFundación Cardiovascular de Colombia · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental well-being plays a pivotal role within the broader spectrum of health and illness, encompassing factors such as stress, depression, and anxiety. Nature-based therapeutic interventions have emerged as a promising approach to addressing these mental health challenges. This study seeks to assess the impact of these interventions on stress, depression, and anxiety levels.

methodsWe conducted an extensive search for randomized clinical trials that examined stress, anxiety, and depression levels. The selected studies underwent a rigorous risk-of-bias assessment following the guidelines outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews.

resultsOur review encompassed findings from eight publications. Among them, two studies measuring cortisol levels revealed significant differences between the pre-test and post-test measurements within the intervention groups. In two studies that employed the Stress Response Inventory, a significant decrease in stress levels was observed within the intervention groups in contrast to the control groups. However, no significant differences were noted in studies that utilized the Restorative Outcome Scale. In the assessment of anxiety and depression levels, three studies employed the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, while four studies utilized The Profile of Mood States scale; none of these studies demonstrated significant differences.

conclusionsThe current body of evidence offers limited support for advocating nature-based therapeutic interventions as a primary approach to reducing stress, depression, and anxiety.

Indexed as

blood pressureforestsinterventionnaturestresstherapy cortisol

Identifiers

PMID38534901
PMCPMC10969128
OpenAlexW4392597566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.