Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38534543›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Enhancing Diagnostic Images to Improve the Performance of the Segment Anything Model in Medical Image Segmentation.

Luoyi Kong, Mohan Huang, Lingfeng Zhang, Lawrence Wing Chi Chan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luoyi KongDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Mohan HuangDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Lingfeng ZhangDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Lawrence Wing Chi ChanDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6451-2273

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical imaging serves as a crucial tool in current cancer diagnosis. However, the quality of medical images is often compromised to minimize the potential risks associated with patient image acquisition. Computer-aided diagnosis systems have made significant advancements in recent years. These systems utilize computer algorithms to identify abnormal features in medical images, assisting radiologists in improving diagnostic accuracy and achieving consistency in image and disease interpretation. Importantly, the quality of medical images, as the target data, determines the achievable level of performance by artificial intelligence algorithms. However, the pixel value range of medical images differs from that of the digital images typically processed via artificial intelligence algorithms, and blindly incorporating such data for training can result in suboptimal algorithm performance. In this study, we propose a medical image-enhancement scheme that integrates generic digital image processing and medical image processing modules. This scheme aims to enhance medical image data by endowing them with high-contrast and smooth characteristics. We conducted experimental testing to demonstrate the effectiveness of this scheme in improving the performance of a medical image segmentation algorithm.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence algorithmcomputer-aided diagnosis systemsimage enhancementmedical image

Identifiers

PMID38534543
PMCPMC10967980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.