Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38534536›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Evaluating the Role of Breast Ultrasound in Early Detection of Breast Cancer in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.

Roxana Iacob, Emil Radu Iacob, Emil Robert Stoicescu, Delius Mario Ghenciu, Daiana Marina Cocolea, Amalia Constantinescu, Laura Andreea Ghenciu, Diana Luminita Manolescu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
15.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Benchmarking YOLOs in breast ultrasound lesion segmentation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roxana IacobDepartment of Anatomy and Embriology, 'Victor Babeș' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2894-712X
Emil Radu IacobDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, 'Victor Babeș' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5863-6613
Emil Robert StoicescuDoctoral School, 'Victor Babeș' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4620-3340
Delius Mario GhenciuDoctoral School, 'Victor Babeș' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.
Daiana Marina CocoleaDoctoral School, 'Victor Babeș' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0009-0005-2087-6848
Amalia ConstantinescuDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, 'Victor Babeș' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.
Laura Andreea GhenciuDiscipline of Pathophysiology, 'Victor Babeș' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5326-5438
Diana Luminita ManolescuDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, 'Victor Babeș' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.
Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara · ROPolytechnic University of Timişoara · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer, affecting both genders, but mostly females, exhibits shifting demographic patterns, with an increasing incidence in younger age groups. Early identification through mammography, clinical examinations, and breast self-exams enhances treatment efficacy, but challenges persist in low- and medium-income countries due to limited imaging resources. This review assesses the feasibility of employing breast ultrasound as the primary breast cancer screening method, particularly in resource-constrained regions. Following the PRISMA guidelines, this study examines 52 publications from the last five years. Breast ultrasound, distinct from mammography, offers advantages like radiation-free imaging, suitability for repeated screenings, and preference for younger populations. Real-time imaging and dense breast tissue evaluation enhance sensitivity, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness. However, limitations include reduced specificity, operator dependence, and challenges in detecting microcalcifications. Automatic breast ultrasound (ABUS) addresses some issues but faces constraints like potential inaccuracies and limited microcalcification detection. The analysis underscores the need for a comprehensive approach to breast cancer screening, emphasizing international collaboration and addressing limitations, especially in resource-constrained settings. Despite advancements, notably with ABUS, the primary goal is to contribute insights for optimizing breast cancer screening globally, improving outcomes, and mitigating the impact of this debilitating disease.

Indexed as

automatic breast ultrasoundbreast cancerbreast cancer imagingbreast cancer imaging methodsbreast cancer managementbreast cancer screeningbreast ultrasoundcancer in low income countriescancer in middle-income countriesmammography

Identifiers

PMID38534536
PMCPMC10968105
OpenAlexW4392546033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.