Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38534532›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Electric Field Characteristics of Rotating Permanent Magnet Stimulation.

Pei L Robins, Sergey N Makaroff, Michael Dib, Sarah H Lisanby, Zhi-De Deng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pei L RobinsComputational Neurostimulation Research Program, Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-3224-4990
Sergey N MakaroffDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0478-8248
Michael DibFischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Sarah H LisanbyComputational Neurostimulation Research Program, Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2037-6470
Zhi-De DengComputational Neurostimulation Research Program, Noninvasive Neuromodulation Unit, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8925-0871
National Institute of Mental Health · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USWorcester Polytechnic Institute · US

Funding

Non-invasive Neuromodulation Unit (NNU)ZIAMH002955 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI ZARATE, CARLOS · 2016 to 2025
$40.3M
Charge-Based Brain Modeling Engine with Boundary Element Fast Multipole MethodR01MH130490 · NIMH · WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI Sergey N Makaroff · 2023 to 2026
$3.3M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002955NIH HHS ZIAMH002955, R01 MH130490NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH130490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurostimulation devices that use rotating permanent magnets are being explored for their potential therapeutic benefits in patients with psychiatric and neurological disorders. This study aims to characterize the electric field (E-field) for ten configurations of rotating magnets using finite element analysis and phantom measurements. Various configurations were modeled, including single or multiple magnets, and bipolar or multipolar magnets, rotated at 10, 13.3, and 350 revolutions per second (rps). E-field strengths were also measured using a hollow sphere (r=9.2 cm) filled with a 0.9% sodium chloride solution and with a dipole probe. The E-field spatial distribution is determined by the magnets' dimensions, number of poles, direction of the magnetization, and axis of rotation, while the E-field strength is determined by the magnets' rotational frequency and magnetic field strength. The induced E-field strength on the surface of the head ranged between 0.0092 and 0.52 V/m. In the range of rotational frequencies applied, the induced E-field strengths were approximately an order or two of magnitude lower than those delivered by conventional transcranial magnetic stimulation. The impact of rotational frequency on E-field strength represents a confound in clinical trials that seek to tailor rotational frequency to individual neural oscillations. This factor could explain some of the variability observed in clinical trial outcomes.

Indexed as

depressionelectric fieldfinite element methodhead phantom measurementmagnetic stimulationneuromodulationpermanent magnetsrotating magnets

Identifiers

PMID38534532
PMCPMC10968657
OpenAlexW4392508698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.