Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38534498›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Measurement of the Mapping between Intracranial EEG and fMRI Recordings in the Human Brain.

David W Carmichael, Serge Vulliemoz, Teresa Murta, Umair Chaudhary, Suejen Perani, Roman Rodionov, Maria Joao Rosa, Karl J Friston, Louis Lemieux

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Brain-computer interface: an update for the clinicians.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

David W CarmichaelBiomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9972-0718
Serge VulliemozDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Teresa MurtaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Umair ChaudharyDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Suejen PeraniDevelopmental Imaging and Biophysics section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK.
Roman RodionovDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Maria Joao RosaDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Karl J FristonWellcome Trust Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7984-8909
Louis LemieuxDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3036-7412
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of Lisbon · PTWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are considerable gaps in our understanding of the relationship between human brain activity measured at different temporal and spatial scales. Here, electrocorticography (ECoG) measures were used to predict functional MRI changes in the sensorimotor cortex in two brain states: at rest and during motor performance. The specificity of this relationship to spatial co-localisation of the two signals was also investigated. We acquired simultaneous ECoG-fMRI in the sensorimotor cortex of three patients with epilepsy. During motor activity, high gamma power was the only frequency band where the electrophysiological response was co-localised with fMRI measures across all subjects. The best model of fMRI changes across states was its principal components, a parsimonious description of the entire ECoG spectrogram. This model performed much better than any others that were based either on the classical frequency bands or on summary measures of cross-spectral changes. The region-specific fMRI signal is reflected in spatially and spectrally distributed EEG activity.

Indexed as

BOLDBOLD couplingEEG-fMRIfMRI biophysicsfunctional MRIIntracranial EEG

Identifiers

PMID38534498
PMCPMC10968112
OpenAlexW4392198563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.