Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38534496›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Validation of a New and Straightforward Algorithm to Evaluate Signal Quality during ECG Monitoring with Wearable Devices Used in a Clinical Setting.

Luca Neri, Ilaria Gallelli, Massimo Dall'Olio, Jessica Lago, Claudio Borghi, Igor Diemberger, Ivan Corazza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luca NeriDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3971-9533
Ilaria GallelliIRCCS AOU, Policlinico di S. Orsola, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Massimo Dall'OlioIRCCS AOU, Policlinico di S. Orsola, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Jessica LagoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Claudio BorghiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8039-8781
Igor DiembergerDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3823-3809
Ivan CorazzaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2078-1978

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWearable devices represent a new approach for monitoring key clinical parameters, such as ECG signals, for research and health purposes. These devices could outcompete medical devices in terms of affordability and use in out-clinic settings, allowing remote monitoring. The major limitation, especially when compared to implantable devices, is the presence of artifacts. Several authors reported a relevant percentage of recording time with poor/unusable traces for ECG, potentially hampering the use of these devices for this purpose. For this reason, it is of the utmost importance to develop a simple and inexpensive system enabling the user of the wearable devices to have immediate feedback on the quality of the acquired signal, allowing for real-time correction.

methodsA simple algorithm that can work in real time to verify the quality of the ECG signal (acceptable and unacceptable) was validated. Based on simple statistical parameters, the algorithm was blindly tested by comparison with ECG tracings previously classified by two expert cardiologists.

resultsThe classifications of 7200 10s-signal samples acquired on 20 patients with a commercial wearable ECG monitor were compared. The algorithm has an overall efficiency of approximately 95%, with a sensitivity of 94.7% and a specificity of 95.3%.

conclusionsThe results demonstrate that even a simple algorithm can be used to classify signal coarseness, and this could allow real-time intervention by the subject or the technician.

Indexed as

clinical reliabilityECGlow-cost technologysignal quality evaluationwearable devices

Identifiers

PMID38534496
PMCPMC10968308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.