Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38534493›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Comprehensive Review on Synergy of Multi-Modal Data and AI Technologies in Medical Diagnosis.

Xi Xu, Jianqiang Li, Zhichao Zhu, Linna Zhao, Huina Wang, Changwei Song, Yining Chen, Qing Zhao, Jijiang Yang, Yan Pei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. AI in Medical Questionnaires: Scoping ReviewJournal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Adaptive cascading artificial intelligence for Alzheimer's disease assessment: a clinically oriented narrative review and implementation framework.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xi XuFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Jianqiang LiFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Zhichao ZhuFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Linna ZhaoFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Huina WangFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Changwei SongFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Yining ChenFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Qing ZhaoFaculty of Information Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Jijiang YangTsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4124-6408
Yan PeiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, The University of Aizu, Aizuwakamatsu 965-8580, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1545-9204

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No.62266041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disease diagnosis represents a critical and arduous endeavor within the medical field. Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, spanning from machine learning and deep learning to large model paradigms, stand poised to significantly augment physicians in rendering more evidence-based decisions, thus presenting a pioneering solution for clinical practice. Traditionally, the amalgamation of diverse medical data modalities (e.g., image, text, speech, genetic data, physiological signals) is imperative to facilitate a comprehensive disease analysis, a topic of burgeoning interest among both researchers and clinicians in recent times. Hence, there exists a pressing need to synthesize the latest strides in multi-modal data and AI technologies in the realm of medical diagnosis. In this paper, we narrow our focus to five specific disorders (Alzheimer's disease, breast cancer, depression, heart disease, epilepsy), elucidating advanced endeavors in their diagnosis and treatment through the lens of artificial intelligence. Our survey not only delineates detailed diagnostic methodologies across varying modalities but also underscores commonly utilized public datasets, the intricacies of feature engineering, prevalent classification models, and envisaged challenges for future endeavors. In essence, our research endeavors to contribute to the advancement of diagnostic methodologies, furnishing invaluable insights for clinical decision making.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningdisease diagnosislarge modelmachine learningmulti-modal data

Identifiers

PMID38534493
PMCPMC10967767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.