Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38534480›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Artificial Intelligence Models for the Automation of Standard Diagnostics in Sleep Medicine-A Systematic Review.

Maha Alattar, Alok Govind, Shraddha Mainali

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Sleep Medicine-What's in a Name?Journal of sleep research · 2025
    Review
  6. Artificial intelligence in sleep medicine: assessing the diagnostic precision of ChatGPT-4.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Artificial intelligence may fill the gap of underdiagnosis in sleep medicine: the role of ChatGPT-4.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maha AlattarDivision of Adult Neurology, Sleep Medicine, Vascular Neurology, Department of Neurology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA.
Alok GovindDepartment of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore 560029, India.ORCID 0009-0006-1086-0399
Shraddha MainaliDivision of Vascular Neurology and Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9495-3843

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep disorders, prevalent in the general population, present significant health challenges. The current diagnostic approach, based on a manual analysis of overnight polysomnograms (PSGs), is costly and time-consuming. Artificial intelligence has emerged as a promising tool in this context, offering a more accessible and personalized approach to diagnosis, particularly beneficial for under-served populations. This is a systematic review of AI-based models for sleep disorder diagnostics that were trained, validated, and tested on diverse clinical datasets. An extensive search of PubMed and IEEE databases yielded 2114 articles, but only 18 met our stringent selection criteria, underscoring the scarcity of thoroughly validated AI models in sleep medicine. The findings emphasize the necessity of a rigorous validation of AI models on multimodal clinical data, a step crucial for their integration into clinical practice. This would be in line with the American Academy of Sleep Medicine's support of AI research.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningsleep and AIsleep disorderssleep medicine

Identifiers

PMID38534480
PMCPMC10967859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.