ReviewCells2024
Pros and Cons of Cryopreserving Allogeneic Stem Cell Products.
Review in Cells, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safe in transit: HSCT clinical outcomes unaffected by stem cell transport time.Bone marrow transplantation · 2026Article
- Effect of Fresh versus Cryopreserved Grafts on Febrile Neutropenia and Infections in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Factors Determining Mortality.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Uterus Cryopreservation From Experimental Models to Clinical Application: A Translational Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Clinical Impact of Graft Cryopreservation on Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: An Italian, Registry-Based Study on Behalf of the "Gruppo Italiano Per Il Trapianto di Midollo Osseo, Cellule Staminali Emopoietiche e Terapia Cellulare" (GITMO).American journal of hematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has precipitously changed the practice of transplanting fresh allografts. The safety measures adopted during the pandemic prompted the near-universal graft cryopreservation. However, the influence of cryopreserving allogeneic grafts on long-term transplant outcomes has emerged only in the most recent literature. In this review, the basic principles of cell cryopreservation are revised and the effects of cryopreservation on the different graft components are carefully reexamined. Finally, a literature revision on studies comparing transplant outcomes in patients receiving cryopreserved and fresh grafts is illustrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.