Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia and Retinitis Pigmentosa: Novel

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Anisometropia and Its Related Traits: Ocular, Systemic, and Genetic Characteristics-Results From the Gutenberg Health Study.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026
   Article
2. Clinical Utility of NGS-Based Diagnosis in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: Experience from a Brazilian Pediatric Cohort at a Reference Center for Rare Diseases.Genes · 2026
   Article
3. Advances in RPGR gene therapy for X‑linked retinitis pigmentosa: From preclinical insights to clinical application (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as