Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38534125›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of hand surgery, European volume2024

Long-term outcome of the Sauvé-Kapandji procedure in patients with post-traumatic distal radioulnar joint disorders.

Gijs P Debeij, Pascal F W Hannemann, Jan A Ten Bosch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of hand surgery, European volume, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gijs P DebeijDepartment of Surgery, Division of Trauma Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3403-9398
Pascal F W HannemannDepartment of Surgery, Division of Trauma Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jan A Ten BoschDepartment of Surgery, Division of Trauma Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aims of this study were to retrospectively assess the occurrence of complications or need for secondary wrist procedures after the Sauvé-Kapandji procedure, and to prospectively assess patient-reported outcomes at long-term follow-up. All patients treated with the Sauvé-Kapandji procedure in our tertiary referral hospital between January 2008 and September 2021 were identified and contacted to complete the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and the Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation outcome measures. In total, 30 patients, with a median follow-up of 82 months, were included in this study. Complications occurred in 6 of 30 patients, which resulted in six secondary wrist procedures. Mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation scores were 30.1 and 33.6, respectively. We conclude that in respect of long-term outcomes, the Sauvé-Kapandji procedure can still be deemed to be a useful procedure, especially in patients with few other reconstructive options.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresWrist JointAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesReoperationRetrospective StudiesWrist InjuriesYoung AdultDistal radioulnar jointosteotomypatient-reported outcomespseudoarthrosisSauvé-Kapandji

Identifiers

PMID38534125
PMCPMC11590385
OpenAlexW4393233902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.