Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38533955›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2024

Deviation From Personalized Blood Pressure Targets Correlates With Worse Outcome After Successful Recanalization.

Zhe Zhang, Yuehua Pu, Lei Yu, Haiwei Bai, Wanying Duan, Xin Liu, Ximing Nie, Zhixuan Wen, Lina Zheng, Xiao Hu and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systolic blood pressure targets after successful endovascular thrombectomy: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Zhe ZhangNeurocritical Care Unit, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China.ORCID 0009-0006-8199-7456
Yuehua PuNeurocritical Care Unit, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China.ORCID 0000-0002-9443-2706
Lei YuNeurocritical Care Unit, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China.ORCID 0009-0007-5147-6235
Haiwei BaiNeurocritical Care Unit, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China.ORCID 0000-0002-2050-4770
Wanying DuanNeurocritical Care Unit, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China.ORCID 0000-0003-3527-9454
Xin LiuNeurocritical Care Unit, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China.
Ximing NieNeurocritical Care Unit, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China.ORCID 0000-0002-8380-4076
Zhixuan WenNeurocritical Care Unit, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China.ORCID 0009-0005-7740-9343
Lina ZhengNeurocritical Care Unit, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China.ORCID 0000-0003-1501-0351
Xiao HuCenter for Data Science, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing Emory University Atlanta GA.ORCID 0000-0001-9478-5571
Xinyi LengDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine & Therapeutics Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital Shatin Hong Kong SAR.ORCID 0000-0001-7300-6647
Yuesong PanChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases Beijing Tiantan Hospital Beijing China.ORCID 0000-0003-3082-6789
Nils H PetersenDivisions of Neurocritical Care and Stroke, Department of Neurology Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT.ORCID 0000-0001-9711-3340
Liping LiuNeurocritical Care Unit, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China.ORCID 0000-0003-2943-055X
Capital Medical University · CNChinese University of Hong Kong · HKEmory University · USHebei Medical University · CNYale New Haven Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersonalized blood pressure (BP) management for patients with acute ischemic stroke after successful endovascular thrombectomy lacks evidence. We aimed to investigate whether the deviation of BP from cerebral autoregulation limits is associated with worse outcomes. METHODS AND

resultsWe determined autoregulation by measuring mean velocity index and calculated the percentage of time and the burden (defined as the time-BP area) with BP outside the autoregulatory limits of each subject within 48 hours after endovascular thrombectomy. In total, 91 patients with large vessel occlusion stroke who had achieved successful recanalization were prospectively enrolled between May 2020 and February 2022. The burden with BP outside the autoregulatory limits was associated with poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 3-6) at 90 days (adjusted odds ratio, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.03-1.59]). The percentage of time with BP out of the autoregulatory limits was correlated with early neurological deterioration (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores increased ≥2 at 7 days) (adjusted odds ratio, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.04-1.83]). The burden of BP that decreased below the autoregulatory lower limit was associated with significant infarct growth (volume of infarct growth >11.6 mL) at 7 days (adjusted odds ratio, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.01-1.44]). The percentage of time that BP exceeded the autoregulatory upper limit was associated with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours (adjusted odds ratio, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.02-2.34]).

conclusionsBoth the percentage of time and the burden of BP that deviates from the autoregulation-preserved range are associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes. This study highlights the potential benefits of autoregulation-guided BP management strategy after successful recanalization.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaEndovascular ProceduresIschemic StrokeStrokeBlood PressureHumansInfarctionRetrospective StudiesThrombectomyTreatment Outcomeacute strokebrain ischemiacerebral autoregulationneurocritical carereperfusion

Identifiers

PMID38533955
PMCPMC11179781
OpenAlexW4393224498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.