ReviewNucleus (Austin, Tex.)2024
Mechanobiology of the nucleus during the G2-M transition.
Review in Nucleus (Austin, Tex.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chromosome condensation mechanically primes the nucleus for mitosis.The EMBO journal · 2026Article
- Dysregulated expression of cell cycle regulators CDC20, PLK1, BUB1, CDC45, CDCA5 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Setting Up to Divide: Nuclear Mechanotransduction in the Regulation of Mitosis.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2026Review
- Repurposing Cell Cycle Oscillators for Multiciliated Cell Differentiation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Unraveling dynamics of nuclear pore and chromatin via HS-AFM.Anatomical science international · 2026Review
- Nuclei sense complex tissue shape and direct intestinal stem cell fate.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Mechanical Forces, Nucleus, Chromosomes, and Chromatin.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Radiation symptoms resemble laminopathies and the physical underlying cause may sit at the lamin A C-terminus.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Review
- Quantifying Nuclear Shape Fluctuations During Early Mitosis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Interdependence between Nuclear Pore Gatekeepers and Genome Caretakers: Cues from Genome Instability Syndromes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cellular behavior is continuously influenced by mechanical forces. These forces span the cytoskeleton and reach the nucleus, where they trigger mechanotransduction pathways that regulate downstream biochemical events. Therefore, the nucleus has emerged as a regulator of cellular response to mechanical stimuli. Cell cycle progression is regulated by cyclin-CDK complexes. Recent studies demonstrated these biochemical pathways are influenced by mechanical signals, highlighting the interdependence of cellular mechanics and cell cycle regulation. In particular, the transition from G2 to mitosis (G2-M) shows significant changes in nuclear structure and organization, ranging from nuclear pore complex (NPC) and nuclear lamina disassembly to chromosome condensation. The remodeling of these mechanically active nuclear components indicates that mitotic entry is particularly sensitive to forces. Here, we address how mechanical forces crosstalk with the nucleus to determine the timing and efficiency of the G2-M transition. Finally, we discuss how the deregulation of nuclear mechanics has consequences for mitosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.