Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38533482›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2024

Machine learning prediction of refractory ventricular fibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using features available to EMS.

Rayhan Erlangga Rahadian, Yohei Okada, Nur Shahidah, Dehan Hong, Yih Yng Ng, Michael Y C Chia, Han Nee Gan, Benjamin S H Leong, Desmond R Mao, Wei Ming Ng and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Rayhan Erlangga RahadianLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Yohei OkadaHealth Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Nur ShahidahDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Dehan HongEmergency Medical Services Department, Singapore Civil Defence Force, Singapore.
Yih Yng NgLee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Michael Y C ChiaEmergency Department, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Han Nee GanAccident & Emergency, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Benjamin S H LeongEmergency Medicine Department, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Desmond R MaoDepartment of Acute and Emergency Care, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Wei Ming NgEmergency Medicine Department, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Nausheen Edwin DoctorDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Marcus Eng Hock OngHealth Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Nanyang Technological University · SGSingapore General Hospital · SGChangi General Hospital · SGKhoo Teck Puat Hospital · SGKyoto University · JPMinistry of Defence · SGNational University Hospital · SGNg Teng Fong General Hospital · SGSengkang General Hospital · SGTan Tock Seng Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a treatment challenge in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models that could be implemented by emergency medical services (EMS) to predict refractory VF/VT in OHCA patients. Methods: This was a retrospective study examining adult non-traumatic OHCA patients brought into the emergency department by Singapore EMS from the Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study (PAROS) registry. Data from April 2010 to March 2020 were extracted for this study. Refractory VF/VT was defined as VF/VT persisting or recurring after at least one shock. Features were selected based on expert clinical opinion and availability to dispatch prior to arrival at scene. Multivariable logistic regression (MVR), LASSO and random forest (RF) models were investigated. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) area under curve (AUC) analysis and calibration plots. Results: 20,713 patients were included in this study, of which 860 (4.1%) fulfilled the criteria for refractory VF/VT. All models performed comparably and were moderately well-calibrated. ROC-AUC were 0.732 (95% CI, 0.695 - 0.769) for MVR, 0.738 (95% CI, 0.701 - 0.774) for LASSO, and 0.731 (95% CI, 0.690 - 0.773) for RF. The shared important predictors across all models included male gender and public location. Conclusion: The machine learning models developed have potential clinical utility to improve outcomes in cases of refractory VF/VT OHCA. Prediction of refractory VF/VT prior to arrival at patient's side may allow for increased options for intervention both by EMS and tertiary care centres.

Indexed as

ECPRMachine learningOHCAPrediction modelRefractory VF

Identifiers

PMID38533482
PMCPMC10963854
OpenAlexW4392969600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.