Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38533427›Full record

ArticleInternational medical case reports journal2024

Writing Case Reports Can Improve Seven Components in Clinical Reasoning.

Toshinori Nishizawa, Kosuke Ishizuka, Yuki Otsuka, Toshiyuki Nakanishi, Akira Kawashima, Taiju Miyagami, Shun Yamashita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International medical case reports journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Toshinori NishizawaDepartment of General Internal Medicine, St Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kosuke IshizukaDepartment of General Medicine, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4313-6592
Yuki OtsukaDepartment of General Medicine, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
Toshiyuki NakanishiDepartment of Emergency and General Medicine, Nerima Hikarigaoka Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira KawashimaDepartment of General Internal Medicine, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Taiju MiyagamiDepartment of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4893-2224
Shun YamashitaDepartment of General Medicine, Saga University Hospital, Saga, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5143-8665

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Case reports provide scientific knowledge and opportunities for new clinical research. However, it is estimated that less than 5% of cases presented by Japanese generalists at academic conferences are published due to various barriers such as the complex process of writing articles, conducting literature searches, the significant time required, the reluctance to write in English, and the challenge of selecting appropriate journals for publication. Therefore, the purpose of this opinion paper is to provide clinicians with practical tips for writing case reports that promote diagnostic excellence. In recent years, clinical practitioners have been striving for diagnostic excellence and optimal methods to accurately and comprehensively understand the patient's condition. To write a case report, it is essential to be mindful of the elements of diagnostic excellence and consider the quality of the diagnostic reasoning process. We (the authors) are seven academic generalists who are members of the Japanese Society of Hospital General Medicine (JSHGM) - Junior Doctors Association, with a median of 7 years after graduation and extensive experience publishing case reports in international peer-reviewed journals. We conducted a narrative review and discussed ways to write case reports to promote diagnostic excellence, leveraging our unique perspectives as academic generalists. Our review did not identify any reports addressing the critical points in writing case reports that embody diagnostic excellence. Therefore, this report proposes a methodology that describes the process involved in writing diagnostic excellence-promoting case reports and provides an overview of the lessons learned. Based on our review and discussion, we explain the essential points for promoting diagnostic excellence through case reports categorized into seven components of clinical reasoning. These strategies are useful in daily clinical practice and instrumental in promoting diagnostic excellence through case reports.

Indexed as

case reportsclinical reasoningdiagnostic excellence

Identifiers

PMID38533427
PMCPMC10963171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.