ArticlePostepy dermatologii i alergologii2024
Comparative efficacy of combined antihistamine and montelukast therapy in adult patients with atopic dermatitis.
Article in Postepy dermatologii i alergologii, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Leukotriene Receptor Antagonists for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2025Pooled it
- Off-Label Treatment in Inflammatory Skin Diseases-European Point of View.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common chronic skin conditions affecting about 20% of children and 5% of adults. However, the studies assessing novel therapies for AD have been focused mainly on paediatric patients and only few studies have involved adult participants. Aim: To compare the treatment outcomes between the antihistamine monotherapy and combined intervention with an antihistamine agent and a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist in adult patients with atopic dermatitis. Material and methods: Patients were randomized into two groups to receive 5 mg oral desloratadine or the combined therapy with 5 mg oral desloratadine and 10 mg montelukast. Both groups were also administered topical treatment using the same protocol (topical Elocon and moisturizer). To estimate the efficacy of the implemented therapy methods, different skin health scores (SCORAD, GISS, EASI, PPNRS and DLQI) and skin functional assessment outcomes (corneometry, pH and transepidermal water loss) were evaluated before and after the treatment. Results: Significant differences were revealed in compared measurement results for scales of the Extent and Severity of Eczema assessment, Global Individual Signs Score, Eczema Area and Severity Index, Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale, Dermatology Life Quality Index and Skin Functional Properties (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Comparison of data presenting the therapy outcomes in two groups showed that administration of the combined therapy was significantly more effective compared to the antihistamine monotherapy. The results revealed considerable efficacy of the combined therapy reinforced by the use of cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, montelukast.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.