ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024
Super resolution-based methodology for self-supervised segmentation of microscopy images.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data-driven Artificial Intelligence (AI)/Machine learning (ML) image analysis approaches have gained a lot of momentum in analyzing microscopy images in bioengineering, biotechnology, and medicine. The success of these approaches crucially relies on the availability of high-quality microscopy images, which is often a challenge due to the diverse experimental conditions and modes under which these images are obtained. In this study, we propose the use of recent ML-based image super-resolution (SR) techniques for improving the image quality of microscopy images, incorporating them into multiple ML-based image analysis tasks, and describing a comprehensive study, investigating the impact of SR techniques on the segmentation of microscopy images. The impacts of four Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)- and transformer-based SR techniques on microscopy image quality are measured using three well-established quality metrics. These SR techniques are incorporated into multiple deep network pipelines using supervised, contrastive, and non-contrastive self-supervised methods to semantically segment microscopy images from multiple datasets. Our results show that the image quality of microscopy images has a direct influence on the ML model performance and that both supervised and self-supervised network pipelines using SR images perform better by 2%-6% in comparison to baselines, not using SR. Based on our experiments, we also establish that the image quality improvement threshold range [20-64] for the complemented Perception-based Image Quality Evaluator(PIQE) metric can be used as a pre-condition by domain experts to incorporate SR techniques to significantly improve segmentation performance. A plug-and-play software platform developed to integrate SR techniques with various deep networks using supervised and self-supervised learning methods is also presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.