ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024
Decoding emotional responses to AI-generated architectural imagery.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- How AI-animated historical photographs evoke emotional resonance: the mediating role of mental imagery and the moderating effect of perceived historical authenticity.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Algorithmic governance at work: a legal-sociological and policy analysis of AI regulation, institutional power and labor rights.Frontiers in sociology · 2026Article
- A Prompt Engineering Method for Generating Emotional Images for Psychological Research.Affective science · 2025Article
- The illusion of empathy: evaluating AI-generated outputs in moments that matter.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Digitalized therapy and the unresolved gap between artificial and human empathy.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The integration of AI in architectural design represents a significant shift toward creating emotionally resonant spaces. This research investigates AI's ability to evoke specific emotional responses through architectural imagery and examines the impact of professional training on emotional interpretation. Methods: We utilized Midjourney AI software to generate images based on direct and metaphorical prompts across two architectural settings: home interiors and museum exteriors. A survey was designed to capture participants' emotional responses to these images, employing a scale that rated their immediate emotional reaction. The study involved 789 university students, categorized into architecture majors (Group A) and non-architecture majors (Group B), to explore differences in emotional perception attributable to educational background. Results: Findings revealed that AI is particularly effective in depicting joy, especially in interior settings. However, it struggles to accurately convey negative emotions, indicating a gap in AI's emotional range. Architecture students exhibited a greater sensitivity to emotional nuances in the images compared to non-architecture students, suggesting that architectural training enhances emotional discernment. Notably, the study observed minimal differences in the perception of emotions between direct and metaphorical prompts among architecture students, indicating a consistent emotional interpretation across prompt types. Conclusion: AI holds significant promise in creating spaces that resonate on an emotional level, particularly in conveying positive emotions like joy. The study contributes to the understanding of AI's role in architectural design, emphasizing the importance of emotional intelligence in creating spaces that reflect human experiences. Future research should focus on expanding AI's emotional range and further exploring the impact of architectural training on emotional perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.