ArticleCureus2024
The Effect of Lymphovascular Invasion on Short-Term Tumor Recurrence and Progression in Stage T1 Bladder Cancer.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- MRI-based deep learning combined with radiomics for the preoperative prediction of lymphovascular invasion in patients with bladder cancer.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Prognostic factors in T1 high-grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder with lymphovascular invasion: a retrospective cohort study.International urology and nephrology · 2025Article
- Impact of lymphovascular invasion and histological variants on BCG-treated high-grade NMIBC prognosis.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is the most important stage for tumor spread and metastasis. The role of LVI in transurethral resection is not yet clear. In this study, the progression and recurrences of patients who underwent transurethral resection bladder tumor (TUR-BT) and T1 high-grade tumor and concomitant LVI were detected in pathology results and were evaluated. Methods Our study included 58 patients, who underwent TUR-BT with the suspicion of bladder cancer and were pathologically diagnosed with T1 stage bladder cancer and who did not undergo radical surgery, in the Urology Clinic of Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Turkey. The patient's age, gender, tumor size, tumor grade, presence of LVI, second resection, recurrence, and progression rates at three months and one year were compared. Results LVI was detected in the pathology specimens of nine (15.5%) of the 58 patients who were included in the study. When the one-year progression was evaluated, progression to T2 tumor was detected in six (66.7%) patients in the group with LVI and five (10.2%) patients in the group without LVI, and the progression was significantly higher in the group with LVI (p=0.001). In logistic regression analysis, the only significant predictor for one-year progression was the presence of LVI (p=0.001). Conclusion According to the results of our study, the presence of LVI in the pathology specimens of patients with T1 high grade significantly increases the progression. Suggesting radical cystectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy to patients with LVI in the early period seems to be a more accurate approach, considering the course of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.